Skip to main content

On restrictions of ordered paramodulation with simplification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
10th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE 1990)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 449))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider a restricted version of ordered paramodulation, called strict superposition. We show that strict superposition (together with equality resolution) is refutationally complete for Horn clauses, but not for general first-order clauses. Two moderate enrichments of the strict superposition calculus are, however, sufficient to establish refutation completeness. This strictly improves previous results. We also propose a simple semantic notion of redundancy for clauses which covers most simplification and elimination techniques used in practice yet preserves completeness of the proposed calculi. The paper introduces a new and comparatively simple technique for completeness proofs based on the use of canonical rewrite systems to represent equality interpretations.

The research described in this paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant CCR-8901322, by the ESPRIT-project PROSPECTRA (ref. no. 390), and by a travel grant from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

This work was done while the second author was on leave at SUNY at Stony Brook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachmair, L., Dershowitz, N., and Plaisted, D. 1989. Completion without failure. In Resolution of Equations in Algebraic Structures, vol. 2, ed. H. Ait-Kaci and M. Nivat, 1–30. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmair, L., and Ganzinger, H. 1990. Completion of first-order clauses with equality by strict superposition. In Proc. Second Int. Workshop on Conditional and Typed Rewriting Systems. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganzinger, H. 1987. A completion procedure for conditional equations. In Conditional Term Rewriting Systems, ed. S. Kaplan and J.-P. Jouannaud, 62–83. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 308. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. To appear in J. Symbolic Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hsiang, J., and Rusinowitch, M. 1987. On word problems in equational theories. In Proc. 14th ICALP, ed. T. Ottmann, 54–71. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 267. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hsiang, J., and Rusinowitch, M. 1989. Proving refutational completenes of theorem proving strategies: The transfinite semantic tree method. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huet, G. 1980. Confluent reductions: Abstract properties and applications to term rewriting systems. J. ACM 27:797–821.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knuth, D., and Bendix, P. 1970. Simple word problems in universal algebras. In Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, ed. J. Leech, 263–297. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kounalis, E., and Rusinowitch, M. 1988. On word problems in Horn theories. In Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Automated Deduction, ed. E. Lusk and R. Overbeek, 527–537. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 310. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lankford, D. 1975. Canonical inference. Tech. Rep. ATP-32, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson, G., and Wos, L. T. 1969. Paramodulation and theorem proving in first order theories with equality. In Machine Intelligence 4, ed. B. Meltzer and D. Michie, 133–150. New York, American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rusinowitch, M. 1988. Theorem proving with resolution and superposition: An extension of the Knuth and Bendix procedure as a complete set of inference rules. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wos, L. T., Robinson, G. A., Carson, D. F., and Shalla, L. 1967. The concept of demodulation in theorem proving. J. ACM 14:698–709.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, H. 1988. Reduction, superposition and induction: Automated reasoning in an equational logic. Ph.D. diss., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Schenectady, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, H., and Kapur, D. 1988. First-order theorem proving using conditional rewrite rules. In Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Automated Deduction, ed. E. Lusk and R. Overbeek, 1–20. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 310. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mark E. Stickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H. (1990). On restrictions of ordered paramodulation with simplification. In: Stickel, M.E. (eds) 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction. CADE 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52885-7_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52885-7_105

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47171-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics