Abstract
Witnesses are small entities recording the state of a replicated object. They are especially useful in voting protocols as these protocols require 2n + 1 replicas to guarantee continuous access to the data in the presence of n site failures but allow some of these replicas to be replaced by a witness.
We propose in this paper two orthogonal enhancements to the original voting with witnesses protocol. Our first proposal introduces a new kind of witness that can be stored in volatile memory and is put in a state of temporary amnesia when it recovers from a hardware failure. Our second proposal allows the set of all current replicas to act as a majority even when it only has a minority of the votes; it is then referred to as a leading minority.
We show that under standard Markovian assumptions two full replicas and one volatile witness managed by a majority consensus voting protocol recognizing leading minorities provide a data availability comparable to that achieved by three full replicas managed by majority consensus voting.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Ahamad and M. H. Ammar, “Performance Characterization of Quorum-Consensus Algorithms for Replicated Data,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-15, 4 (1989), pp. 492–496.
D. Agrawal and A. El Abbadi, “Reducing Storage for Quorum Consensus Algorithms,” Proc. 14th VLDB Conference (1988), pp. 419–430.
J. Bechta Dugan and G. Ciardo, “Stochastic Petri Net Analysis of a Replicated File System,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-15, 4 (1989), pp. 394–401.
D. Barbara, H. Garcia-Molina, and A. Spauster, “Increasing Availability Under Mutual Exclusion Constraints with Dynamic Vote Reassignment,” ACM Transaction on Computer Systems, 7, 4 (1989), pp. 394–426.
J. L. Carroll and D. D.E. Long, “The Effect of Failure and Repair Distributions on Consistency Protocols for Replicated Data Objects,” PROC. 22d Annual Simulation Symposium (1989), pp. 47–60.
D. Davcev and W. A. Burkhard, “Consistency and Recovery Control for Replicated Files,” Proc. 10th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (1985) pp. 87–96.
C. A. Ellis, “Consistency and Correctness of Duplicate Database Systems,” Operating Systems Review, 11 (1977).
D. K. Gifford, “Weighted Voting for Replicated Data,” Proc. 7th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (1979), pp. 150–161.
A. Hisgen, A. Birrell, T. Mann, M. Schroeder, and G. Swart, “Availability and Consistency Tradeoffs in the Echo Distributed File System,” Proc. 2nd Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, (1989), pp. 49–54.
B. V. Gnedenko, Yu. K. Belyayev and A. D. Solovyev, Mathematical Methods of Reliability Theory, (English translation of “Matematicheskiye Metody v Teorii Nadezhnosti”), Academic Press, New York (1969).
S. Jajodia and D. Mutchler, “Enhancements to the Voting Algorithm,” Proc. 13th VLDB Conference (1987), pp. 399–405.
D. D. E. Long and J.-F. Pâris, “A Realistic Evaluation of Optimistic Dynamic Voting,” Proc. 7th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, (1988), pp. 129–137.
J.-F. Pâris, “Voting with Witnesses: A Consistency Scheme for Replicated Files,” Proc. 6th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, (1986), pp. 606–612.
J.-F. Paris “Voting with Bystanders,” Proc. 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, (1989), pp. 394–401.
C. Pu, J. D. Noe and A. Proudfoot, “Regeneration of Replicated Objects: A Technique and its Eden Implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-14, 7 (1988), pp. 936–945.
R. van Renesse and A. Tanenbaum, “Voting with Ghosts,” Proc. 8th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, (1988), pp. 456–462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pâris, JF. (1990). Efficient voting protocols with witnesses. In: Abiteboul, S., Kanellakis, P.C. (eds) ICDT '90. ICDT 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 470. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-53507-1_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-53507-1_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53507-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46682-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive