Skip to main content

Time in confluences: Dealing with delays for consistency-checking

  • Temporal Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 116 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 541))

Abstract

Most model-based approaches to diagnosis require a procedure which checks for the consistency of the observations, given a model of the diagnosed system. When dealing with a dynamically changing system such a procedure must take into account time-varying data. Additional difficulties arise when delays are involved in interactions between variables. The worst case occurs when some of the delays are completely unspecified.

This paper presents an approach to consistency-checking which handles qualitative models of dynamic systems exhibiting time lags. A component-centered ontology is adopted to model the structure of the physical system and an episode-based approach is adopted for representing its behavior over time. An example consisting of a physical process exhibiting transportation lags is used to illustrate the power of the approach. Algorithms are presented and illustrated by an output from an implementation in Prolog called C-CAT (Consistency-Checking Along Time).

The solution proposed represents an extension to Brian Williams' Temporal Constraint Propagation methodology. It also extends the applicability range of existing approaches to model-based diagnosis, permitting its use in tasks such as on-line diagnosis of dynamic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. F. Allen, 1984, “Towards a General Theory of Action and Time”, Artificial Intelligence, 23, 123–154.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Allen and P. J. Hayes, 1989, “Moments and Points in an Interval-Based Temporal Logic”, Computational Intelligence, 5, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cardoso and E. Costa, 1990, “Time in Confluences: Dealing with Delays for Consistency-Checking (Extended Paper)”, Tech. Report DEE-UC-003-90, University of Coimbra.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. de Kleer and J. S. Brown, 1984, “A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluences”, Artificial Intelligence 24 (1–3), 7–83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. de Kleer and J. S. Brown, 1986, “Theories of Causal Ordering”, Artificial Intelligence 26 (1), 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. de Kleer and B. C. Williams, 1987, “Diagnosing Multiple Faults”, Artificial Intelligence 32 (1), 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. de Kleer, A. K. Mackworth and R. Reiter, 1990, “Characterizing Diagnosis”, Procs. AAAI-90, Vol.1, 324–330, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. D. Forbus, 1984, “Qualitative Process Theory”, Artificial Intelligence 24 (1–3), 85–168.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. J. Hayes, “The Second Naive Physics Manifesto”, 1985, in: J. H. Hobbs and R. C. Moore (Eds.), “Formal Theories of the Commonsense World”, 1–36, Ablex Publ. Corp., Norwood, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Kuipers, 1986, “Qualitative Simulation”, Artificial Intelligence 29 (3), 289–338.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Raiman, 1989, “Diagnosis as a Trial: The Alibi Principle”, Model-Based Diagnosis Int. Workshop, 31–42, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Reiter, 1987, “A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles”, Artificial Intelligence 32 (1), 57–95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. J. Sussman and G.L. Steele Jr., 1980, “CONSTRAINTS: A Language for Expressing Almost Hierarchical Descriptions”, Artificial Intelligence 14 (1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. C. Williams, 1986, “Doing Time: Putting Qualitative Reasoning on Firmer Ground”, Procs. AAAI-86, Vol.1, 105–112, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. C. Williams, 1990, “Temporal Qualitative Analysis: Explaining How Physical Systems Work”, in: D. S. Weld and J. de Kleer (Eds.), “Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems”, 133–177, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pedro Barahona Luís Moniz Pereira António Porto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cardoso, A., Costa, E. (1991). Time in confluences: Dealing with delays for consistency-checking. In: Barahona, P., Moniz Pereira, L., Porto, A. (eds) EPIA 91. EPIA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54535-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38459-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics