Skip to main content

Another view of autoepistemic logic and truth maintenance system

  • Communications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 542))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel Autoepistemic Logic (NAE) that subsumes both Moore's original Autoepsteimc logic (AE) and Konolige's stronger extensions. The semantics of the logic is characterized by a combination of AE extensions and minimum stable theories. Although the logic is still based on fixpoints, it always has a NAE extension for any AE theory. Unlike Konolige's strongly-grounded AE extension, strongly-grounded NAE extension is syntax-independent and always exists. In particular, it is shown that strongly-grounded NAE can provide a complete semantics to Truth Maintenance System (TMS) because NAE can additionally account for backtracking routines in TMS. In contrast, strongly-grounded AE can only capture the semantical aspect of TMS that is free of backtracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • A.L. Brown (1988) Logics of justified belief ECAI 88, pp.507–512, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Camilla (1990) A tableaux-based theorem prover for a decidable subset of default logic, CADE 10, LNCS 449, pp.528–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Doyle (1979) A truth maintenance system AI 12, pp.231–272, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gelfond (1988) AE logic and formalization of commonsense reasoning Comp. Science. Dept., Univ. of Texas at El Paso.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hanks & D. McDermott (1986) Default reasoning, nonmonotonic logics and the frame problem AAAI 86, pp.328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.J. Jiang (1992) Autoepistemic predicate logic to appear in Journal of New Generation Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.J. Jiang (1991) Quanticational autoepistemic stable closure in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Konolige (1987) On the relationship between default and autoepistemic logic IJCAI 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Marek & M. Trunszczynski (1989) Relating autoepistemic logic and default logic KR 89, pp.276–288, full-version also to appear in JACM 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Moore (1985) Semantic considerations of non-monotonic logic AI 25 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Morris (1988) Autoepistemic stable closures and contradiction resolution AAAI 88, 2nd int. workshop on nonmonotonic reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Reinfrank, O. Dressier & G. Brewka (1989) On the relation between truth maintenance and autoepistemic logic IJCAI 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Stalnaker (1980) A note on non-monotonic modal logic Dept. of Philo. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Z. W. Ras M. Zemankova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, Y.J. (1991). Another view of autoepistemic logic and truth maintenance system. In: Ras, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 542. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54563-8_115

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54563-8_115

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54563-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38466-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics