Skip to main content

Handling uncertainty in knowledge-based computer vision

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1991)

Abstract

Probability theory provides a sound theoretical foundation for handling uncertainty in computer vision. Its objective interpretation allows us to use data for improving the quantitative and qualitative structure of our KB. An important challenge in vision is to find which are the important features to recognize the different objects in the world, and a probabilistic approach provides a useful tool for advancing in this direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cooper, G.F. (1990), “The Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Inference Using Bayesian Networks”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 42, pp. 393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mackworth, A. (1988) “Adequacy Criteria for Visual Knowledge Representation”, in Z. Pylyshyn (ed.), Computational Processes in Human Vision: An Interdisciplinary Prespective, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKeown, D.M., Harvey, W.A. and McDermott, J. (1985), “Rule-Based Interpretation of Aerial Imagery”, IEEE PAMI, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 570–585.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohta, Y. (1985), Knowledge-based Interpretation of Outdoor Natural Colour Scenes, Pitman, Boston, Mass., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pearl, J. (1988), Probabilstic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perkins, W.A. (1986), “Rule-based Interpreting of Aerial Photographs using the Lockheed Expert System”, Optical Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Provan, G.M (1987), “The Visual Constraint Recognition System (VICTORS): Exploring the Role of Reasoning in High-Level Vision”, Proc. IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision, pp. 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rao, A.R. and Jain, R. (1988), “Knowledge Representation and Control in Computer Vision Systems”, IEEE Expert, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sucar, L.E. and Gillies, D.F. (1990), “Knowledge-Based Assistant for Colonoscopy” in Proc. Third International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Vol. II, ACM, pp. 665–672.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sucar, L.E., Gillies, D.F., and Gillies, D.A. (1991), “Handling Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Using Objective Probability” in Proc. World Congress on Expert Systems, Orlando, Fl., Dec. 16–19 (to be published).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wesley, L.P. (1986), “Evidential Knowledge-based Computer Vision”, Optical Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rudolf Kruse Pierre Siegel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sucar, L.E., Gillies, D.F., Gillies, D.A. (1991). Handling uncertainty in knowledge-based computer vision. In: Kruse, R., Siegel, P. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 548. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54659-6_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54659-6_110

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46426-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics