Skip to main content

The special-relation rules are incomplete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction—CADE-11 (CADE 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The special-relation rules give accelerated treatment to transitivity, substitutivity, and other axioms classed as “monotonicity properties”. These rules extend paramodulation and other equality rules to relations other than equality. In this paper, it is established that these rules are all logically incomplete. The incompleteness of the negative paramodulation rule of Wos and McCune is also demonstrated.

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants CCR-89-04809, CCR-89-11512, and CCR-89-13641, by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under contract NAG2-703, and by the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research under contract AFOSR-90-0057.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W.W. Bledsoe and L. Hines: Variable elimination and chaining in a resolution-based prover for inequalities. Proc. 5th Conf. Automated Deduction, 281–292, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.S. Boyer and J S. Moore: A Computational Logic. Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V.J. Digricoli and M.C. Harrison: Equality-based binary resolution. J. ACM, 33(2):253–289, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Hines: Str∔ve \(\subseteq\): The str∔ve-based subset prover, Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Automated Deduction, 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hsiang and M. Rusinowitch: A new method for establishing refutational completeness in theorem proving. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automated Deduction, 141–152, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Kapur and P. Narendran: An equational approach to theorem proving in the first-order predicate calculus. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Automated Deduction, 1146–1153, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Manna, M. Stickel, and R. Waldinger: Monotonicity properties in automated deduction. In Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, V. Lifschitz (editor), Academic Press, 261–279, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Manna and R. Waldinger: Logical Basis for Computer Programming. Volume 1: Deductive Reasoning. Addison-Wesley, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Manna and R. Waldinger: Special relations in automated deduction. J. ACM, 33(1):l–59, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Manna and R. Waldinger: Logical Basis for Computer Programming. Volume 2: Deductive Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.W. McCunc: OTTER 2.0 Users' Guide. Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Lab., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.B. Morris: E-resolution: An extension of resolution to include the equality relation. Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 287–294, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.E. Peterson: A technique for establishing completeness results in theorem proving with equality. SIAM J. Comput., 12(1):82–100, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Robinson: A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. J. ACM, 12(1):23–41, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Robinson and L. Wos: Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality. In Machine Intelligence 4, B. Meltzer and D. Michie (editors), American Elsevier, 135–1509, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.H. Siekmann: Unification theory. J. of Symbolic Computation, 7(3/4):207–274, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.R. Smith: Constructing specification morphisms. Technical Report, Kestrel Institute, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.E. Stickel: Automated deduction by theory resolution. J. Automated Reasoning, 1(4):333–335, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Wos and W.W. McCune: Negative paramodulation. Proc. 8th Conf. Automated Reasoning, 229–239, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Deepak Kapur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Manna, Z., Waldinger, R. (1992). The special-relation rules are incomplete. In: Kapur, D. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-11. CADE 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_187

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55602-8_187

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55602-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47252-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics