Skip to main content

User models and information theory in the design of a query interface for GIS

  • Technical Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 639))

Abstract

The design of user interfaces has lacked a firm theoretical foundation. A solid user interface theory would be particularily helpful in complex systems, such as GIS. Information theory and user modelling are presented here as a promising approach to building such a theory. Their applicability is considered in the context of querying a geographical database. Different theories of information are reviewed and some misunderstandings are corrected. Any communication can be examined on three different levels: syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. The syntactic information of a message is its relative frequency within language without any concern for the meaning of the message. The semantic information content of a message is defined as how many different states of the universe distinguishable in the language it excludes logically. The pragmatic information is the personal meaning of the message to the sender and the receiver. User modelling methodology is presented as a way to handle pragmatic information. Research into user models is reviewed and the potential of GIS applications and further study are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R. B. (1990). User models: theory method and practice. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32(5): 511–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. H. (1990). Map as a language/a metaphor extended. Cartographica, 27(1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). Semantic information and its measures. Transactions of the Tenth Conference on Cybernetics, Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, New York. pp. 33–48. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y. (1955). An examination of information theory. Philosophy of Science, 22: 86–105. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and Information. Addison Wesley and the Jerusalem Academic Press, Reading, Mass. & Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. (1967). Semiologie Graphique. Mouton & Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørke, J. T. & Aasgaard, R. (1990). Cartographic zoom. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zürich, Switzerland. pp. 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, C. (1981). Cartographic communication. Cartographica, 18(2): 42–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brajnik, G., Guida, G. & Tasso, C. (1990). User modelling in expert man-machine interfaces: a case study in intelligent information retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 20(1): 166–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. & Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). An outline of a theory of semantic information. Technical Report No. 247 of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J. M., Mack, R. L., & Kellog, W. A. (1988). Interface metaphors and user interface design. In: M. Helander (1988), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, C. (1957). On human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K. & Hughes, J. F. (1990). Computer graphics: principles and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, U. (1980). Can communication theory form the basis of a general theory of cartography? Nachtrichten aus dem Karten-und Vermessungsvesen, p.17–35, reihe II, heft nr. 38, Frankfurt A.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, M. D. & McGranaghan, M. (1990). Metaphor in geographic information systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zürich, Switzerland. pp. 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. T. & Courtis, M. C. (1966). Information theory and figure perception: the metaphor that failed. Acta Psychologica, 25: 12–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guelke, L. (1977). Cartographic communication and geographic understanding. Cartographica monograph no. 19. pp. 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, C. G. (1984). The map as natural language: a paradigm for understanding. Cartographica, 21(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (1970). On the information provided by observations. In: J. Hintikka & P. Suppes (eds.), Information and inference, D, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. pp. 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1968). The varieties of information and scientific explanation. In: B. v Roostelaar & J. F. Staal (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science III, Proceedings of the 1967 International Congress, North-, Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 311–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1970). Surface information and depth information. In: J. Hintikka & P. Suppes (eds.), Information and inference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. pp. 263–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holynski, M. (1988). User adaptive computer graphics. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 29(5): 539–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates, J. S. (1982). Understanding maps. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, W. (1990). Are displays maps of views? Proceedings, AutoCarto 10, Baltimore, Maryland. Edited by D. M. Mark & D. White. pp. 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, W. & Frank, A. (1992). A formalization of metaphors and image-schemas in user interfaces. In: D. Mark & A. Frank (eds.), Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, 8.-20.7.1990, Spain. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, M. (1991). Tietokonekartasto hypermediaa soveltaen. (Applying hypermedia in a computer atlas, in Finnish) Geodeettinen laitos, tiedote 4/kartografia.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEahren, A. & Ganter, J. H. (1990). A pattern identification approach to cartographic visualization. Cartographica, 27(2): 64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, D. Jr. (1972). The meaning of information. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. (1990). Tieto, informaatio ja yhteiskunta — filosofinen käsiteanalyysi. (Knowledge, information and society — a philosophical conceptual analysis, in Finnish) Valtion painatuskeskus, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E. (1983). Users are individuals: individualizing user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18(3): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. H. & Petchenick, B. B. (1976). The nature of maps: essays toward understanding maps and mapping. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. & Petchenick, B. (1977). The map as a communication system. Cartographica monograph no. 19. pp. 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salichtchev, K. A. (1977). Some reflections on the subject and method of cartography after the sixth international cartographic conference. Cartographica monograph no. 19. pp. 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the user interface. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Chesire, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen (1990). Who's afraid of GIS — creating user interfaces for GIS users. Proceedings of EGIS, First European Conference on Geographical Information Systems, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 1210–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zissos & Witten, (1985). User modelling for a computer coach: a case study. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23(6): 729–750.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

A. U. Frank I. Campari U. Formentini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lindholm, M., Sarjakoski, T. (1992). User models and information theory in the design of a query interface for GIS. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds) Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 639. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55966-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55966-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55966-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47333-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics