Skip to main content

Representing natural language causality in Conceptual Graphs: The Higher order conceptual relation problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 699))

Abstract

This paper studies the conceptual relations expressed in NL-texts in order to represent texts meaning in Conceptual Graphs. Causality is taken as a working example. Representation is considered first. Causal connectors are defined in terms of CGs, and algorithms show how these definitions combine with the connected constituent graphs. As conceptual relations hold between situations or events rather than between simple concepts, their arguments in connector definitions are constrained to be situation concepts. After this the specific case of argumentative relations involving speech situation is examined. A simple representation of these situations is proposed and an additional constraint is introduced in argumentative connector definitions (e.g. since). A second aspect, interpretation, is also looked at so as to tackle the problem of implicit yet informative relations. A partial order on relations is used to simulate human understanding of implicit links in the light of our propensity to interpret everything in causal terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Bérard-Dugourd, J. Fargues, M.-C. Landau. Natural Language Analysis Using Conceptual Graphs. Proceedings of the International Computer Science Conf'88, Hong-Kong, Dec. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Sowa. Conceptual Structures. Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Sowa. Conceptual Graph Notations. Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Conceptual Structures, AAAI Conference, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Sabah, A. Vilnat. Flexible case structure implemented into a deterministic parser. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Conceptual Structures. Suny Binghamton, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Shoham. Reasoning About Change: Time and Causation from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Nazarenko-Perrin. Causal Ambiguity in Natural Language: Conceptual Representation of’ parce que/because’ and’ puisque/since'. Proceedings of Coling'92, ICCL Conference, Nantes, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Ducrot. Les mots du discours. Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Moulin. Modeling Temporal Knowledge in Discourse: a Refined Approach. Proceedings. of the Seventh Annual Workshop on Conceptual Structures. Las Cruces, NM, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Ducrot. Dire et ne pas dirt: Principes de sémantique linguistique. Hermann, Paris, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roger C. Schank, Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Guy W. Mineau Bernard Moulin John F. Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nazarenko, A. (1993). Representing natural language causality in Conceptual Graphs: The Higher order conceptual relation problem. In: Mineau, G.W., Moulin, B., Sowa, J.F. (eds) Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation. ICCS 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 699. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56979-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56979-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56979-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47848-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics