Skip to main content

Point probe decision trees for geometric concept classes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 709))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

A fundamental problem in model-based computer vision is that of identifying to which of a given set of concept classes of geometric models an observed model belongs. Considering a “probe” to be an oracle that tells whether or not the observed model is present at a given point in an image, we study the problem of computing efficient strategies (“decision trees”) for probing an image, with the goal to minimize the number of probes necessary (in the worst case) to determine in which class the observed model belongs. We prove a hardness result and give strategies that obtain decision trees whose height is within a log factor of optimal.

These results grew out of discussions that began in a series of workshops on Geometric Probing in Computer Vision, sponsored by the Center for Night Vision and Electro-Optics, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and monitored by the U.S. Army Research Office. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation.

Partially supported by NSF Grants ECSE-8857642 and CCR-9204585.

Partially supported by the NSF and DARPA under Grant CCR-8908092, by the NSF under Grants CCR-9003299, and IRI-9116843.

Partially supported by grants from Hughes Research Laboratories, Boeing Computer Services, Air Force Office of Scientific Research contract AFOSR-91-0328, and by NSF Grants ECSE-8857642 and CCR-9204585.

Partially supported by NSF Grant CCR-89-08901 and by grant JSA 91-5 from the Bureau of the Census.

Partially supported by NSF grant CCR-9109289 and New York Science and Technology Foundation grants RDG-90171 and RDG-90172.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Arkin and J. Mitchell. Applications of combinatorics and computational geometry to pattern recognition. Technical report, Cornell University, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.M. Arkin, H. Meijer, J.S.B. Mitchell, D. Rappaport, and S.S. Skiena. Decision trees for geometric models. Proc. Ninth ACM Symp. on Comput. Geometry, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bienenstock, D. Geman, and S. Geman. A relational approach in object recognition. Technical report, Brown University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bienenstock, D. Geman, S. Geman, and D.E. McClure. Phase II: Development of laser radar ATR algorithms. Contract No. DAAL02-89-C-0081, CECOM Center for Night Vision and Electro-Optics, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Chazelle and H. Edelsbrunner. An optimal algorithm for intersecting line segments in the plane. J. ACM, 39:1–54, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Garey. Optimal binary identification procedures. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 23:173–186, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. T. Goodrich. A polygonal approach to hidden-line and hidden-surface elimination. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 54:1–12, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Hyafil and R. Rivest. Constructing optimal binary decision trees is NP-complete. Information Processing Letters, 5:15–17, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Lovász. On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers. Discrete Mathematics, 13:383–390, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Mirelli. Computer vision is a highly structured optimization problem. Manuscript, Center for Night Vision and Electro-Optics, Fort Belvoir, VA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Moret. Decision trees and diagrams. Computing Surveys, pages 593–623, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. H. Papadimitriou. On certain problems in algorithmic vision. Technical report, Computer Science, UCSD, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Frank Dehne Jörg-Rüdiger Sack Nicola Santoro Sue Whitesides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arkin, E.M., Goodrich, M.T., Mitchell, J.S.B., Mount, D., Piatko, C.D., Skiena, S.S. (1993). Point probe decision trees for geometric concept classes. In: Dehne, F., Sack, JR., Santoro, N., Whitesides, S. (eds) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 709. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57155-8_239

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57155-8_239

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57155-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47918-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics