Skip to main content

Acquisition and validation: from text to semantic network

  • Life Cycle and Methodologies
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 723))

Abstract

This paper presents how modeling knowledge in a logic-based semantic network allows domain knowledge acquisition from texts and its validation.

This modeling is implemented in a knowledge-based software engineering tool, DASERT 1, to acquire and validate functional requirements in natural language. The user describes the functional specifications through informal methods, using graphics with comments in natural language. During this elaboration step, the system validates the document by processing the comments semantically to detect ambiguities or inconsistencies. To do so it uses natural language processing and knowledge base engineering.

From a software engineering point of view, DASERT' originality is to provide a semantic checking of an informal specification by interpreting the natural language comments. From a knowledge acquisition point of view, DASERT allows acquisition from texts to build the kernel of a knowledge base which is then used to guide the semantic parsing of texts during the acquisition of the specification itself. Moreover, the representation formalism provides a unified view of acquisition and validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABRETT Glenn, BURSTEIN Mark H., The KREME knowledge editing environment, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 27, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. ALLGAYER Jürgen, HARBUSCH Karin, KOBSA Alfred, REDDIG Carola, REITHINGER Norbert, SCHMAUKS Dagmar, XTRA: a natural-language access system to expert systems, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 31, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. AYEL Marc, ROUSSET Marie-Christine, La cohérence dans les bases de connaissances, Cepadues-Editions, France, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. BIEBOW Brigitte, COUPEY Pascal, SZULMAN Sylvie, Using exceptions in a semantic network for a natural language application, Proc. of the 2nd EUROSPEECH, Paris, France, September 89

    Google Scholar 

  5. BIEBOW Brigitte, SZULMAN Sylvie, Validation de cahiers des charges rédigés en langage naturel, Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, France, May 91

    Google Scholar 

  6. BOLTON David, JONES Sara, TILL David, FURBER David, GREEN Stewart, Knowledge-based support for requirements engineering, Int. Journ. of Softw. Eng. and Know. Eng., vol.2, n∘2, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. BOURIGAULT Didier, Surface grammatical analysis for the extraction of terminological noun phrases, Proc. of the 15th COLING, Nantes, France, August 92

    Google Scholar 

  8. BRACHMAN Ronald J., On the epistemological status of semantic networks, In Associative networks: representation and use of knowledge by computers, N. V. Findler, editor, Academic Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brachman Ronald J., SCHMOLZE James G., An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System, Cognitive Science, vol.9, n∘2, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. BREUKER J, WIELINGA B, KADS: Structured Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, France, May 85

    Google Scholar 

  11. CONDAMINES Anne, Aide à l'acquisition de connaissances par la spécification de la terminlogie d'un domaine de spécialité, Proc. of the 3rd Journées d'Acquisition des Connaissances, Dourdan, France, April 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. COUPEY Pascal, Etude d'un réseau sémantique avec gestion des exceptions, PhD thesis, University of Paris-Nord, France, January 89

    Google Scholar 

  13. COUPEY Pascal, FOUQUERE Christophe, Default Subsumption in Terminological Languages, I.R., University of Paris-Nord, France, February 93

    Google Scholar 

  14. HORS Pascale, ROUSSET Marie-Christine, Consistency of structured knowledge: a formal framework based on description logics, EUROVAV, Palma de Majorque, Spain, March 24–26, 93

    Google Scholar 

  15. JAMES P., Structuring knowledge using knowledge graphs, Proc. of the 5th EKAW, Crieff, Scottland, May 20–24, 91

    Google Scholar 

  16. JAMES P., Knowledge Graphs, Linguistic Instruments in Knowledge Engineering, R.P. van de Riet and R.A. Meersman ed., Elsevier Science Pub., 1992

    Google Scholar 

  17. JANSEN-WINKELN Roman M., WASTL: an approach to knowledge acquisition in the natural language domain, Proc. of the 2nd EKAW, Bonn, Germany, June 88

    Google Scholar 

  18. KIETZ Jörg-Uwe, Incremental and reversible acquisition of taxinomies, Proc. of the 2nd EKAW, Bonn, Germany, June 88

    Google Scholar 

  19. LAURENT Jean-Pierre, Proposals for a valid terminology in KBS Validation, Proc. of the 10th ECAI, Vienna, Austria, August 92

    Google Scholar 

  20. TANG Xiaming, RABAUX Eric, MAESANO Libéro, Knowledge modeling with Open KADS, A.I.C.D. workshop, Strasbourg, France, January 93

    Google Scholar 

  21. MANAGO Michel, CONRUYT Noël, LE RENARD Jacques, Acquiring descriptive knowledge for classification and identification, Proc. of the 6th EKAW, Heidelberg, Germany, May 92

    Google Scholar 

  22. NEBEL Bernhard, Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, J. Siekman ed., Springer-Verlag 90

    Google Scholar 

  23. NEWELL Allen, The knowledge level, Artficial Intelligence 18(1), 1982

    Google Scholar 

  24. RAMAMOORTHY C. V., LUIS Miguel, YOUNG-CHUL Shim, On issues in software engineering and artificial intelligence, Int. Journ. of Softw. Eng. and Know. Eng., vol.1, n∘1, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  25. REITER Raymond, A logic for Default Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, vol.13 n∘1-2, April 80

    Google Scholar 

  26. ROSS D. T., SCHOMAN K. E., Structured Analysis for Requirements Definition, IEEE Trans. on Softw. Eng., special issue on requirements analysis, vol. SE-3, January 77

    Google Scholar 

  27. SLATOR Brian M., Extracting lexical knowledge from dictionary text, Knowledge Acquisition, vol.1, n∘1, March 89

    Google Scholar 

  28. SOWA John, Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Addison-Wesley, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  29. Towards the expressive power of natural language; Principles of Semantic Networks: Exploration in the Representation of Knowledge, John Sowa ed., Morgan Kaufman Pub., 1991

    Google Scholar 

  30. VOGEL Claude, Génie cognitif, Masson, France, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  31. WILKS Yorick, Good and bad arguments about semantic primitives, RR n∘42, AI department, University of Edinburgh, May 1977

    Google Scholar 

  32. WOODS William A, What's in a link: Foundations for Semantic Networks, Representation and Understanding: studies in Cognitive Science, D.G. Bobrow and A. Collins ed., Academic Press, New-York, 1975

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

N. Aussenac G. Boy B. Gaines M. Linster J. -G. Ganascia Y. Kodratoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biébow, B., Szulman, S. (1993). Acquisition and validation: from text to semantic network. In: Aussenac, N., Boy, G., Gaines, B., Linster, M., Ganascia, J.G., Kodratoff, Y. (eds) Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems. EKAW 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57253-8_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57253-8_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47996-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics