Skip to main content

Selecting observation time in the monitoring and interpretation of time-varying data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 728))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

A lot of previous approaches to monitoring involved a continuous reading of the system parameters in order to recognize when anomalies in the behavior of the system under examination can trigger the diagnostic process. This paper deals with the application of Markov chain theory to the selection of observation time in the monitoring and diagnosis of time-varying systems. The goal of the present paper is to show how, by assuming a framework where the temporal behavior of the components of the system is modeled in a stochastic way, the continuous observation of critical parameters can be avoided; indeed, this kind of approach allows us to get a useful criterion for choosing observation time in domains where getting observations can be expensive. Observations are then requested only when the necessity for a diagnostic process becomes relevant and a focusing on the components that are more likely to be faulty can also be achieved.

This work has been partially supported by CNR under grant n. 92.00061.CT12 and MURST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bergadano, F. Brancadori, D. De Marchi, A. Giordana, S. Radicchi, and L. Saitta. Applying machine learning to troubleshooting: a case study in a real domain. In Proc. 10th Int. Conference on Expert Systems and Their Applications, pages 169–180, Avignon, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Berzuini, S. Quaglini, and R. Bellazzi. Temporal reasoning via bayesian networks. In Atti primo congresso AI * JA, pages 248–257, Trento, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Console, L. Portinale, D. Theseider Dupré, and P. Torasso. Diagnostic reasoning across different time points. In Proc. 10th ECAI, pages 369–373, Vienna, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Console, L. Portinale, D. Theseider Dupré, and P. Torasso. Diagnosing time-varying misbehavior: an apporoach based on model decomposition. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (to appear), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Console and P. Torasso. A spectrum of logical definitions of model-based diagnosis. Computational Intelligence, 7(3):133–141, 1991. Also in [12].

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. de Kleer and B.C. Williams. Diagnosis with behavioral modes. In Proc. 11th IJCAI, pages 1324–1330, Detroit, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Downing. Consistency-based diagnosis in physiological domains. In Proc. AAAI-92, pages 558–563, San Jose, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Doyle and E. Sacks. Markov analysis of qualitative dynamics. Computational Intelligence, 7(1):1–10, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Dvorak and B. Kuipers. Model-based monitoring of dynamic systems. In Proc. 11th IJCAI, pages 1238–1243, Detroit, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Friedrich and F. Lackinger. Diagnosing temporal misbehaviour. In Proc. 12th IJCAI, pages 1116–1122, Sydney, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Hamscher. Modeling digital circuits for troubleshooting. Artificial Intelligence, 51(1–3):223–271, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Hamscher, L. Console, and J. de Kleer. Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Hamscher and R. Davis. Diagnosing circuit with state: an inherently underconstrained problem. In Proc. AAAI 84, pages 142–147, Austin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.J. Holtzblatt, M.J. Nejberg, R.L. Piazza, and M.B. Vilain. Temporal methods: multidimensional modeling of sequential circuits. In Proc. 2nd Int. Work. on Principles of Diagnosis, pages 111–120, Milano, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.C. Kemeny and J.L. Snell. Finite Markov Chains. Springer Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Lackinger and W. Nejdl. Integrating model-based monitoring and diagnosis of complex dynamic systems. In Proc. 12th IJCAI, pages 1123–1128, Sydney, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.K. Molloy. Discrete time stochastic Petri nets. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, SE-11(2):417–423, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.F. Neuts. Probability. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Portinale. Modeling uncertain temporal evolutions in model-based diagnosis. In Proc. 8th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 244–251, Stanford, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.M. Provan. Modeling the dynamics of diagnosis and treatment using temporal influence diagrams. In Working Notes 3rd International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, pages 97–106, Rosario, WA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.S. Trivedi. Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queueing and Computer Science Applications. Prentice-Hall, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pietro Torasso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Portinale, L. (1993). Selecting observation time in the monitoring and interpretation of time-varying data. In: Torasso, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 728. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57292-9_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57292-9_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57292-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48038-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics