Abstract
This paper develops two ways of analyzing the human-computer interaction of a computer application in use in an organization. The techniques, historical analyses and conflicting perspectives analysis, and the interplay between them, are used in providing the basis for a more detailed analysis.
Historical analyses focus on the historical development of artifacts and their use. Conflicting perspectives analysis reflects on the roles of the artifact in use, as system, tool, or medium. Combined, the two types of analysis allow for a focus in particular on conflicts between the roles of a specific artifact in use.
The techniques are based on human activity theory. They are illustrated by means of a case study of a computer application from a project with the Danish National Labour Inspection Service.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Bannon, S. Bødker: Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in [7].
O. Bisgaard, P. Mogensen, M. Nørby, M. Thomsen: Systemudvikling som lærevirksomhed, konflikter som basis for organisationel udvikling (DAIMI IR-88). Århus, Aarhus University, 1989.
S. Bødker: A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces. In Human Computer Interaction, T. Moran, (Ed.), Vol. 4, No. 3, 171–196 (1989).
S. Bødker: Through the Interface — a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
S. Bødker: Understanding computer applications in use — a human activity analysis. In P. Bøgh Andersen, B. Holmquist H. Klein, R. Posner: The semiotics of the workplace, in preparation.
S. Bødker, E. Christiansen, P. Ehn, R. Markussen, P. Mogensen, R. Trigg: Computers in Context. Report from the AT-project in Progress. Report of the 1991 NES-SAM conference, Ebeltoft, Denmark, 1991.
J. M. Carroll (Ed.): Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Y. Engeström: Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
J. Kammersgaard: Four different perspectives on human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28: 343–362 (1988).
S. Maass, H. Oberquelle: Perspectives and metaphors for human-computer interaction. In C. Floyd et al. (Eds.): Software development and reality construction., Berlin: Springer Verlag 1992, pp. 233–251.
R. Markussen: A historical perspective on work practices and technology. In P. Bøgh Andersen, B.Holmqvist, J. F. Jensen (Eds.): The Computer as a Medium, Cambridge University Press, in press.
D. Norman: Cognitive artifacts. In [7]. pp. 17–38.
M. Robinson: Introduction to “common artefact”. COMIC-SF-4-1, 1992.
P. Sørgaard: Object Oriented Programming and Computerised Shared Material. In Second European Conference on Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP '88), ed. S. Gjessing, K. Nygaard, 319–334. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bødker, S. (1993). Historical analysis and conflicting perspectives — Contextualizing HCI. In: Bass, L.J., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. EWHCI 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57433-6_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57433-6_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57433-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48152-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive