Abstract
We have presented algorithms for verification and sensitivity analysis of minimum spanning trees. Both algorithms are optimal; however, the exact bound on the number of processors for deterministic sensitivity analysis is not known. This leaves the obvious open question from the Dixon, Rauch and Tarjan paper: “What is the best bound on the number of comparisons needed to perform sensitivity analysis?” The algorithms given here are for the CREW PRAM model. Can these algorithms be transformed into an EREW algorithm?
A very interesting question now is whether the new result of Klein and Tarjan
Research partially supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship and by DIMACS (Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center. Grant No. NSF-STC88-09648.
Research at Princeton University partially supported by the National Science Foundation. Grant No. CCR-8920505, the Office of Naval Research. Contract No. N00014-91-J-1463. and by DIMACS (Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center, Grant No. NSF-STC88-09648.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
N. Alon and B. Schieber Optimal preprocessing for answering on-line product queries, Unpublished manuscript
B. Awerbuch and Y. Shiloach, New connectivity and MSF algorithms for shuffle-exchange network and PRAM, IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol. C-36, No. 10, Oct. 1987, pp. 1258–1263
H. Booth and J. Westbrook, Linear Algorithms for Analysis of Minimum Spanning and Shortest Path Trees in Planar Graphs, Yale University, Department of Computer Science, TR-768, Feb. 1990.
B. D. Dixon, M. Rauch, and R. E. Tarjan, Verification and Sensitivity Analysis of Minimum Spanning Trees in Linear Time, SIAM J. Comput. 21(6) (1992) pp. 1184–1192.
H.N. Gabow, Z. Galil, T. Spencer, and R.E. Tarjan, Efficient Algorithms for Finding Minimum Spanning Trees in Undirected and Directed Graphs, Combinatorica 6(2) (1986) pp. 109–122.
D. Harel and R.E. Tarjan, Fast Algorithms for Finding Nearest Common Ancestors, SIAM J. Comput. 13(2) (1984) pp. 338–355.
P. Klein and R.E. Tarjan, A Randomized Linear Time Algorithm for Finding Minimum Spanning Trees, Personal comunication.
D. B. Johnson and P. Metaxas, A parallel algorithm for computing minimum spanning trees, 4th ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, 1992, pp. 363–372.
R. Karp and V. Ramachandran, Parallel Algorithms for Shared Memory Machines, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science (1990) Chapter 17.
J. H. Reif, An Optimal parallel algorithm for integer sorting, Proc. STOC 26 (1985) 496–504.
B. Schieber and U. Vishkin, On Finding Lowest Common Ancestors: Simplification and Parallelization, SIAM J. Comput. 17(6) (1988) pp. 1253–1262.
R.E. Tarjan, Applications of Path Compressions on Balanced Trees, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 26(4) (1979) pp. 690–715.
R.E. Tarjan, Sensitivity Analysis of Minimum Spanning Trees and Shortest Path Trees, Information Processing Letters 14(1) (1982) pp. 30–33. Corrigendum, Ibid 23 (1986), p.219.
R.E. Tarjan, Data Structures and Network Algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dixon, B., Tkrjan, R.E. (1994). Optimal parallel verification of minimum spanning trees in logarithmic time. In: Cosnard, M., Ferreira, A., Peters, J. (eds) Parallel and Distributed Computing Theory and Practice. CFCP 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 805. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58078-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58078-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58078-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48435-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive