Skip to main content

The size of an intertwine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 820))

Abstract

An intertwine of two graphs H and H′ is a graph G such that G contains both H and H′ as minors, but no proper minor of G contains both H and H′ as minors. We give an upper bound on the size of an intertwine of two given planar graphs. For two planar graphs H and H′, the bound is triply exponential in O(m 5) where m≤max(¦V(H)¦, ¦V(H′)¦). We also give an upper on the size of an intertwine of two given trees T and T′. This bound is exponential in O(m 3 log m) where m≤max(¦V(T)¦, ¦V(T′)¦). Let O 1 be the set of obstructions for a minor closed family L 1 and O 2 the set of obstructions for a minor closed family L 2. It is a natural to ask the following question: how do we given O 1 and O 2 compute the obstructions for L 1L 2 and L 1L 2. Both these sets of obstructions are known to be finite, and to obtain the obstructions for L 1L 2 is easy. However, to compute the obstructions for L 1 ∪ L 2 is hard. Our upper bound enables us to given O 1 and O 2 compute a bound on the size of any obstruction for L 1L 2 whenever L 1 and L 2 are families of planar graphs.

Supported by the Swedish Natural Sciences Research Council

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Arnborg, J. Lagergren, and D. Seese. Problems easy for tree-decomposable graphs. J. of Algorithms, 12:308–340, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bienstock, N. Robertson, P. Seymour, and R. Thomas. Quickly excluding a forest. J. Combinatorial Theory B, 52:274–283, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bodendiek and K. Wagner. Solution to konig's graph embedding problem. Math. Nachr., 140:251–272, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Courcelle. The monadic second order logic of graphs I: Recognizable sets of finite graphs. Information and Computation, 85:12–75, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Didjev and J. Reif. An efficient algorith for the genus problem with explicit construction of forbidden subgraphs. In 31 th Ann. FOCS, pages 337–347, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Gupta and R. Impaglliazzo. Computing planar intertwines. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lagergren. An upper bound on the size of an obstruction. In N. Robertson and P. Seymour, editors, Graph Structure Theory, Contemporary Mathematics vol. 147, pages 601–621. AMS, Providence, Rhode Island, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Robertson, P. Seymour, and R. Thomas. Quickly excluding a planar graph. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Robertson and P.D. Seymour. Graph minors XIII. The disjoint path problem. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Robertson and P.D. Seymour. Graph minors XX. Wagner's conjecture. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Robertson and P.D. Seymour. Graph minors XXI. Graphs with unique linkages. Revised Jan. 1992, Dec. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Seymour, 1993. Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Thomas. A Menger-like property of tree-width. The finite case. J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B, 48:67–76, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Serge Abiteboul Eli Shamir

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lagergren, J. (1994). The size of an intertwine. In: Abiteboul, S., Shamir, E. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 820. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58201-0_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58201-0_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58201-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48566-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics