Skip to main content

Possibility theory, belief revision and nonmonotonic logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 847))

Abstract

This paper is a brief overview of joint work done with Salem Benferhat and Jérôme Lang, at IRIT in Toulouse on the application of possibility theory to automated reasoning under uncertainty. A noticeable aspect of this research is that although first motivated by Zadeh's interpretation of fuzzy sets as elastic constraints, possibilistic logic has developed in close connection with the mainstream research in belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Especially, Gärdenfors' revision postulates leads to an epistemic entrenchment ordering of pieces of knowledge that can be encoded by means of a necessity measure only. And possibilistic logic turns out to belong to the family of preferential logics after Shoham, that unify most of the existing nonmonotonic logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchourron C.E., Gärdenfors P., Makinson D. (1985) On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contradiction and revision. J. of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewka G. (1991) Non-Monotonic Reasoning: Logic Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C.L., Lee R.C.T. (1973) Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L.J. (1977) The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti B. (1974) Theory of Probability. Wiley, New York, Vol. 2, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (1988) Knowledge in Flux. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P., Makinson D. (1994) Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence, 65, 197–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal E. (1978) Conditional possibilities: Independence and non-interactivity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann D. (1989) What does a conditional knowledge base entail ? Proc. of the 1st Inter. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'89) (R.J. Brachman et al., eds.), Toronto, Ontario, 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D. (1989) General theory of cumulative inference. In: Non-Monotonic Reasoning (M. Reinfrank et al., eds.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D. (1994) General patterns of nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming — Vol. 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning (D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, J.A. Robinson, eds.), Oxford Science Publ., 35–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D., Gärdenfors P. (1991) Relation between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. In: The Logic of Theory Change (A. Fuhrmann, M. Morreau, eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 465, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1990) System Z: a natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. Proc. of the 3rd Conf. on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (M. Vardi, ed.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N. (1976) Plausible Reasoning. Van Gorcum, Assen/Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N., Manor R. (1970) On inference from inconsistent premises. Theory and Decision, 1, 179–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle G.L.S. (1961) Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham Y. (1988) Reasoning about Change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

References to the Authors Work

  • Benferhat S., Cayrol C., Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1993a) Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. Proc. of the Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'93), Chambéry, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D., Prade H. (1992) Representing default rules in possibilistic logic. Proc. of the 3rd Inter. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), Cambridge, Mass., Oct. 26–29, 673–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D., Prade H. (1993b) Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. Proc. of the 9th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D., Prade H. (1994) Expressing independence in a possibilistic framework and its application to default reasoning. Proc. of the Europ. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'94), 150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1991) Handling uncertainty, context, vague predicates, and partial inconsistency in possibilistic logic. Proc. of the IJCAI Fuzzy Logic in AI Workshop, Sydney, Aug. 25, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1992) Inconsistency in possibilistic knowledge bases — To live or not live with it. In: Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty (L.A. Zadeh, J. Kacprzyk, eds.), Wiley, New York, 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1994) Possibilistic logic. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. 3 (D.M. Gabbay, ed.), Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1987) Necessity measures and the resolution principle. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 17, 474–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (with the collaboration of Farreny H., Martin-Clouaire R., Testemale C.) (1988) Possibility Theory — An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1991) Epistemic entrenchment and possibilistic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 50, 223–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1992) Belief change and possibility theory. In: Belief Revision (P. Gärdenfors, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 142–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anca L. Ralescu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1994). Possibility theory, belief revision and nonmonotonic logic. In: Ralescu, A.L. (eds) Fuzzy Logic in Artificial Intelligence. FLAI 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 847. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58409-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58409-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58409-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48780-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics