Skip to main content

CONCAT — Connotation analysis of thesauri based on the interpretation of context meaning

  • Legal Systyems
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 856))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge acquisition constitutes the bottleneck for the creation of legal expert systems. Legal language must be formalised to such a degree that it can be processed automatically. We deal with this problem by supporting the process of creating a selective thesaurus for a legal information system which can be seen as prerequisite for further knowledge processing. This selectivity is obtained by means of connotation analysis of the individual descriptors which makes it possible to detect hidden word meanings and to distinguish between precise legal terms and words with fuzzy meaning. Within the prototype system CONCAT we applied both a statistical and a connectionist approach to connotation analysis and performed a comparative evaluation of the achieved results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BELEW, R.K. (1987): A Connectionist Approach to Conceptual Information Retrieval. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BENCH-CAPON, T. (1993): Neural Networks and Open Texture. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BING, J. (1987): Designing Text Retrieval Systems for Conceptual Searching. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BLAIR, D.C./MARON, M.E. (1990): Full-Text Information Retrieval: Further Analysis and Clarification. In: Information Processing & Management, Vol. 26, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CROSS, G.R./deBESSONET, C.G. (1985): Representation of Legal Knowledge for Conceptual Retrieval. In: Information Processing & Management, Vol. 21, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DICK, J.P. (1991): Representation of Legal Text for Conceptual Retrieval. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HAFNER, C.D. (1981): An Information Retrieval System Based on a Computer Model of Legal Knowledge. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. HINTON, G. (1989): Connectionist Learning Procedures. In: Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 40

    Google Scholar 

  9. KOHONEN, T. (1982): Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. In: Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KOHONEN, T. (1989): Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KOHONEN, T. (1990): The Self-Organizing Map. In: Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 78, No. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MERKL, D./TJOA, A. M./VIEWEG, S. (1992): BRANT-An Approach to Knowledge Based Document Classification in the Information Retrieval Domain. Proc. Int. Conf. on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MERKL, D./TJOA, A. M./KAPPEL, G. (1994): Application of Self-Organizing Feature Maps with Lateral Inhibition to Structure a Library of Reusable Software Components. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Comp. Soc. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MITAL, V./STYLIANOU, A./JOHNSON, L. (1991): Conceptual Information Retrieval in Litigation Support Systems. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. OPDORP, G.J. van et al. (1991): Networks at Work — A Connectionist Approach to Non-deductive Legal Reasoning. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence & Law. Baltimore: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PAICE, C.D. (1991): A Thesaural Model of Information Retrieval. In: Information Processing & Management, Vol. 27, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PANYR, J. (1987): Vektorraum-Modell und Clusteranalyse in Information Retrieval-Systemen. In: Nachr. Dok., Vol. 38. (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  18. RUMELHART, D.E./McCLELLAND, J.L. (1986): Parallel Distributed Processing — Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SALTON, G. (1989): Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SALTON, G./McGILL, M.J. (1983): Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SCHWEIGHOFER, E./WINIWARTER, W. (1993a): Legal Expert System KONTERM — Automatic Representation of Document Structure and Contents. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SCHWEIGHOFER, E./WINIWARTER, W. (1993b): Refining the Selectivity of Thesauri by Means of Statistical Analysis. In: Proc. Third Int. Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering. Cologne: Indeks Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  23. WONG, S.K.M./ZIARKO, W./RAGHAVAN, V.V./WONG, P.C.N. (1987): On Modeling of Information Retrieval Concepts in Vector Spaces. In: ACM Trans. on Database Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dimitris Karagiannis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Merkl, D., Schweighofer, E., Winiwarter, W. (1994). CONCAT — Connotation analysis of thesauri based on the interpretation of context meaning. In: Karagiannis, D. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 856. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58435-8_197

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58435-8_197

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48796-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics