Abstract
Assumption-based (AB) framework [BTK93] is a generalisation of abduction. It augments a theory with a set of admissible assumptions that it can defend against any attacks. Autoepistemic logic is a nonmonotonic logic about an ideal agent who reasons about her beliefs and ignorance introspectively. On the surface, these two formalisms look very different. A closer examination reveals many similarities. Indeed, BTK93 has shown that stable extensions in the AB framework of an autoepistemic theory correspond to the Moore's AE extensions of the theory. In this paper, we shall continue to establish some more relationships between the two formalisms. We first reformulate BTK's AB framework for AE logic with a modal approach. We then provide an AB framework for a revised preferred extension that neither subsumes nor being subsumed by Przymusinski's 3-valued AE logic. We then show that the AB framework for a revised complete extension of any consistent AE theory strictly subsumes Przymusinski's 3-valued AE logic. By exploiting the clear structure of the modally reformulated AB framework, we further define an AB framework for a reflexive preferred (cf. stable, complete) extension that integrates Schwarz 's reflexive AE logic with Przymusinski's 3-valued AE logic.
Supported financially by the Royal Thai Government Scholarship.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. Bonatti (1992) Model-theoretic semantics for demo Meta 92.
A. Bondarenko, F.Toni and R.A.Kowalski (1993) An assumption-based framework for nonmonotonic reasoning 2nd Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning workshop, pp.171–189.
P.M. Dung (1993) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming IJCAI-93, pp.852–857.
M. Gelfond (1988) AE logic and formalization of commonsense reasoning 2nd Int. Workshop on nonmonotonic reasoning.
Y.J. Jiang (1993a) Revisable autoepistemic logic, abduction and truth maintenance systems to appear.
Y.J. Jiang (1993b) On the autoepistemic reconstruction of logic programming New Generation Computing 11.
Y.J. Jiang (1994) On multiagent autoepistemic logic — an extrospective view KR 94.
K. Konolige (1988) On the relationship between default and autoepistemic logic AI 35.
H.J. Levesque (1990) All I know: A study in autoepistemic logic AI 42(3), pp. 263–309.
F. Lin and Y. Shoham (1989) Argument Systems:A uniform basis for nonmonotonic reasoning KR'89 pp.245–255.
W. Marek & M. Trunszczynski (1991) Relating autoepistemic logic and default logic JACM 38, 1991.
D. McDermott & J. Doyle (1980) Non-monotonic logic I AI 13, pp. 41–72.
D. McDermott (1982) Nonmonotonic logic II: Nonmonotonic modal theories JACM 29.
R. C. Moore (1985) Semantic considerations of nonmonotonic logic AI 25.
L.M. Pereira, J.N. Aparico & J.J. Alferes (1991) Nonmonotonic reasoning with well-founded semantics ICLP 91.
T.Przymusinski (1991) 3-valued nonmonotonic logics and semantics of logic programs AI 49.
Reiter (1978) Closed World Assumption Logic and Database, edited by Clark and Tarlund.
G. Schwarz (1991) Autoepistemic logic of knowledge 1st Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning workshop.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jiang, Y.J., Aramkulchai, Y. (1994). On the relationship between assumption-based framework and autoepistemic logic. In: RaÅ›, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 869. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58495-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49010-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive