Skip to main content

Business process modeling in the workflow management environment Leu

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Entity-Relationship Approach — ER '94 Business Modelling and Re-Engineering (ER 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 881))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most of todays approaches to business process engineering (also called business process management) start from an activity-centered perspective. They describe activities to be carried out within a business process and their relationships, but they usually pay little attention to the objects manipulated within processes. In this article we discuss an approach to business process management which is based on modeling data-related, activity-related, and organizational aspects of business processes. In fact, the Leu approach to business process management considers data models (describing types of objects to be manipulated in a business process and their relationships), activity models (describing activities to be carried out in a business process), and organization models (describing organizational entities involved in a business process) as separate, but equally important, facets of business processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Barker. CASEMethod Entity Relationship Modelling. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bandinelli, A. Fugetta, C. Ghezzi, and S. Grigolli. Process Enactment in SPADE. In J.-C. Derniame, editor, Software Process Technology — Proceedings of the 2nd European Software Process Modeling Workshop, pages 67–83, Trondheim, Norway, September 1992. Springer. Appeared as Lecture Notes in Computer Science 635.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Broeckers and V. Gruhn. Computer-Aided Verification of Software Process Model Properties. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Advanced information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Paris, France, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. P. Chen. The entity relationship model — towards a unified view of data. In ACM Transactions on Database Systems, volume 1, pages 9–36, March 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Deiters and V. Gruhn. Managing Software Processes in MELMAC. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments, pages 193–205, Irvine, California, USA, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klaus R. Dittrich Object-oriented database systems: The notation and the issues. In Klaus R. Dittrich and U. Dayal, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Object-Oriented Database Systems, pages 2–4, Pacific Grove, California, 1986. IEEE Computer Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.J. Genrich. Predicate/Transition Nets. In W. Brauer, W. Reisig, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Petri Nets: Central Models and Their Properties, pages 208–247, Berlin, FRG, 1987. Springer. Appeared in Lecture Notes on Computer Science 254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Gruhn and R. Jegelka. An Evaluation of FUNSOFT Nets. In J.-C. Derniame, editor, Software Process Technology — Proceedings of the 2nd European Software Process Modeling Workshop, pages 194–214, Trondheim, Norway, September 1992. Springer. Appeared as Lecture Notes in Computer Science 635.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Gruhn. Validation and Verification of Software Process Models. PhD thesis, University Dortmund, June 1991. Appeared as Technical Report No. 394/91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hammer and J. Champy. Reengineering the Corporation. Harper Business, New York, US, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Huber, K. Jensen, and R.M. Shapiro. Hierarchies in Coloured Petri Nets. In Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Application and Theory of Petri Nets, Bonn, FRG, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Parent and S. Spaccapietra. About complex entities, complex objects and object-oriented data models. In E. D. Falkenberg and P. Lindgreen, editors, Information Systems Concepts — An In-depth Analysis, pages 347–360. North-Holland, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Reisig. Petrinetze (in German). Springer, Berlin, FRG, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.J. Tully. Software Process Models and Programs: Observations on their nature and context. In Proceedings of the 4th International Software Process Workshop, Moretonhampstead, Devon, UK, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pericles Loucopoulos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dinkhoff, G., Gruhn, V., Saalmann, A., Zielonka, M. (1994). Business process modeling in the workflow management environment Leu . In: Loucopoulos, P. (eds) Entity-Relationship Approach — ER '94 Business Modelling and Re-Engineering. ER 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 881. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58786-1_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58786-1_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58786-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49100-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics