Skip to main content

The inside and outside views of life

  • 1. Foundations and Epistemology
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 929))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Biology is, better than anything else, about existence in time. Hence biological reality cannot be defined without reference to a temporally situated observer. The coupled or detached character of this observer (with respect to the own time variable of the system) provides a link between the observer and the observed. This connections delimits the kinds of scientific descriptions that can be given at all by an observer. In particular, two fundamentally different forms of description, corresponding to different epistemological attitudes and different philosophies of science, called endo- and exo-physics, can be distunguished. Two old puzzles, the Omniscience Problem (illustrated here on the example of Internal Chemistry) and the Chameleon Problem (originally an argument against philosophical functionalism) are reconsidered in the light of these distinctions. As application, the question, in what sense computer models of life can be suitable for studying life, is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atmanspacher, H. and Dalenoort, G.J. (ed.) 1994: End/Exo Problems in Dynamical Systems, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergson, H. 1944: Creative evolution, The Modern Library, New York (French orig. in 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cariani, P. 1989: On the Design of Devices with Emergent Semantic Functions, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Systems Sci., SUNY at Binghamton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emmeche, C. 1993: The Garden in the Machine: the Emerging Science of Artificial Life, Princeton UP, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein, D. and Finkelstein, S.R. 1983: Computer Interactivity Simulates Quantum Complementarity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 753–779.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galouye, D.F. 1964: Simulacron Three, Gregg Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kampis, G. 1991: Self-Modifying Systems: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information, and Complexity, Pergamon, Oxford-New York, pp 543+xix.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kampis, G. (ed) 1992: Creativity in Nature, Mind and Society, World Futures: TheJnl. of General Evolution, 32/2-3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kampis, G 1993: From Dynamics to Information. The Endophysical Perspective of Change. in: Kampis and Weibel 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kampis, G. 1994: Biological Evolution as a Process Viewed Internally, in: End/Exo Problems in Dynamical Systems (H. Atmanspacher, G.J. Dalenoort ed.), Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kampis, G. and Weibel, P. (ed.) 1993: Endophysics. A New Apporach to the Observer-Problem with Applications in Physics, Biology and Mathematics, Aerial Press, Santa Cruz, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lem, S. 1979: Non Serviam, in: A Perfect Vacuum, M. Secker and Warburg, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Löfgren, L. 1993: Language, Information, and Endophysics. in: Kampis and Weibel 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan, C. Lloyd 1923: Emergent evolution, Williams and Norgate, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagel, E. 1961: The Structure of Science; Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Popper, K.R. 1965: Das Elend des Historizismus. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam, H. 1960: Minds and Machines, in: (S. Hook ed.) Dimensions of Mind, New York Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Putnam, H. 1988: Representation and Reality, MIT Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen, R. 1977: Complexity as a System Property, Int.,J. General Systems 3, 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen, R. 1993: Life Itself, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rössler, O.E. 1987: Endophysics, in: Real Brains — Artificial Minds (ed. Casti, J. and Karlquist, A.), North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rössler, O.E. 1992: Endophysik. Die Welt des Inneren Beobachters, Merve, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rössler, O.E. 1984: Deductive Prebiology, in: Molecular Evolution and Protobiology (ed. Matsuno, K., Dose, K., Harada, K., and Rohlfing, D.L.), Plenum, New York, pp. 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Svozil, K. 1993: Randomness and Undecidability in Physics, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whitehead, A.N. 1929: Process and Reality, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiener, N. 1948: Cybernetics, Or Control and Communication in the Man and the Machine, MIT Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Federico Morán Alvaro Moreno Juan Julián Merelo Pablo Chacón

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kampis, G. (1995). The inside and outside views of life. In: Morán, F., Moreno, A., Merelo, J.J., Chacón, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59496-5_291

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59496-5_291

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49286-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics