Abstract
In this paper we present a new model for the mechanism underlying what is traditionally known in immunology as the “selfnonself” distinction. It turns out that in operational terms, the distinction effected by this model of the immune system is between a sufficiently numerous set of antigens present from the start of the ontogeny of the system on the one hand, and isolated antigens first introduced after the system has reached maturity on the other. The coincidence between this “founder versus late” distinction and the traditional “somatic self-foreign pathogen” one is essentially contingent, an example of the purely opportunistic tinkering characteristic of biological organization in general. We conclude that the so-called “self-nonself” distinction in immunology is a misleading misnomer. This raises the question as to what would genuinely count as a “self-nonself” distinction, a fundamental question for biology in general and Artificial Life in particular.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bateson G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, Chandler.
Bernard J., Bessis M. & Debru C. (Eds) (1990). Soi et non-soi. Paris, Editions du Seuil.
Burnet F.M. (1959). The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. London, Cambridge University Press.
Buss L.W. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Carneiro J. & Stewart J. (1995). Journal of Theoretical Biology (submitted).
Detours V., Bersini H., Stewart J. & Varela F. (1994). Development of an Idiotypic Network in Shape Space. Journal of Theoretical Biology 170, 401–414.
Jerne N.K. (1974). Towards a network theory of the immune system. Annales d'Immunologie (Institut Pasteur) 125C, 373–89.
Klein J. (1982). Immunology: the science of self-nonself discrimination. New York, Wiley.
Maturana H.R. & Varela F.V. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht, Reidel.
Medawar P.B. (1957). The Uniqueness of the Individual. London, Methuen.
Neumann A.U. & Weisbuch G. (1992). Window automata analysis of population dynamics in the immune system. Bull. math. Biol. 81, 645–670.
Sakaguchi S. & Sakaguchi N. (1994). Thymus, T cells and autoimmunity. In A. Coutinho & M.D. Kazatchkine Eds., Autoimmunity: physiology and disease, pp. 203–27. New York, Wiley-Liss.
Varela F.J., Coutinho A., Dupire B. & Vaz N.M. (1988). Cognitive networks: immune, neural and otherwise. In A.S.Perelson Ed., Theoretical Immunology. Vol II, pp. 359–374. New York, Addison Wesley.
Varela F.J. & Coutinho A. (1991). Second generation immune networks. Immunology Today 12, 159–66.
Vaz N.M. & Varela F.V. (1978). Self and non-sense: an organism-centered approach to immunology. Medical Hypothesis 4, 231–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carneiro, J., Stewart, J. (1995). Self and nonseld revisited: Lessons from modelling the immune network. In: Morán, F., Moreno, A., Merelo, J.J., Chacón, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59496-5_315
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59496-5_315
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59496-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49286-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive