Skip to main content

Integration of neural networks and rule based systems in the interpretation of liver biopsy images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 934))

Abstract

Treatment of natural images requires, due to their complexity, to exploit high level knowledge, such as domain knowledge and heuristics, which are typically well formalized by rule based systems. However, the intrinsic variability and irregularity of objects in the image makes their characterization in terms of rules often unfeasible. Such variability and irregularity are, on the other hand, the ultimate reason for the existence of statistical methods. For these reasons, a hybrid system, exploiting characteristics of both approaches, may show better performances than purely syntactical or statistical systems in the interpretation of natural images. In this paper we present a hybrid system for image interpretation that integrates a rule based system with a Labeled Learning Vector Quantizer. The rule based system controls the interpretation process, by dynamically determining the interpretation strategy, and the Labeled Learning Vector Quantizer is exploited as classification kernel. The system has been tested on images of liver biopsies. Results on nuclei classification are here discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.G. deBessonet, A many-valued approach to deduction and reasoning for artificial intelligence, Kluwer, Boston, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bottoni, P. Mussio, and M. Protti, “Metareasoning in the determination of image interpretation strategies”, Patt. Rec. Lett. vol. 15, pp. 177–190, Feb. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. U. Cugini, P. Ferri, P. Mussio, M. Protti, “Pattern-directed restoration and vectorization of digitized engineering drawings”, Comp. & Graph., vol. 8, pp.337–350, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Diamantini and A. Spalvieri, “Vector quantization for minimum error probability,” International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 1091–1094, Sorrento, IT, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Diamantini and A. Spalvieri, “Quantizing for Minimum Bayes Risk,” Proc. International Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications, Sidney, Australia, Nov. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N.Dioguardi, “The liver as a self-organizing system”, Res. Clin. Lab., vol. 19, pp. 281–326, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Fukunaga, “Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition,” New York, Acc. Press 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Garibba, E. Guagnini and P. Mussio, “Multiple-valued Logic Tree: Meaning and Prime Implicants”, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R vol. 34,5, Dec. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.Gersho and R. M. Gray “Vector Quantization and Signal Compression,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.Kohonen, G.Barna and R.Chrisley, “Statistical pattern recognition with neural networks: benchmarking studies,” Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, vol.1, pp.61–68, July 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.Kohonen, “The self organizing map,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 78, n. 9, pp. 1464–1480, Sept. 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Maes, “Computational reflection”, Know. Eng. Rev., vol.3,1, pp.1–19, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Mussio, M. Pietrogrande, P. Bottoni, M. Dell'Oca, E. Arosio, E. Sartirana, M.R. Finanzon, N. Dioguardi, “Automatic cell count in digital images of liver tissue sections”, Proc. 4th IEEE Symposium on Computer-based Medical Systems, pp. 153–160, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.Nagao, “Control strategies in pattern analysis”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 17, n. 1, pp. 45–56, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Rescher, Many-valued logic, McGraw-Hill, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.Rosenfeld, “Computer Vision: Basic Principles” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 76, n. 8, pp. 863–868, August 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Smyth, R.M.Goodman and C.Higgins, “A Hybrid Rule-based/Bayesian Classifier,” Proc. of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 610–615, Stokholm, Sverige, August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Tondl, “Problems of semantics”, Reitel, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pedro Barahona Mario Stefanelli Jeremy Wyatt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bianchi, N., Diamantini, C. (1995). Integration of neural networks and rule based systems in the interpretation of liver biopsy images. In: Barahona, P., Stefanelli, M., Wyatt, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60025-6_152

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60025-6_152

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60025-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49407-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics