Abstract
An update operation presupposes that one can predict how the world changes along time. In the absence of a predictive model of evolution, the common sense law of inertia is usually used and justifies the minimal change approach to the frame problem. Instead of relying on an implicit modeling of persistence, we propose to use an explicit modeling of the expected evolution. We first explain why our previous proposal was not quite satisfactory. We then propose a model-driven semantics of the update operation which can take into account an explicit transition model. The transition model provides a more powerful and flexible way to represent the persistence of information. It can moreover be stressed that non only persistence information but also default and transition rules can be expressed in this transition model. It can then be used to represent evolutive systems as required for example in a monitoring or diagnosis context
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gerhard Brewka and Joachim Hertzberg. How to do things with worlds: On formalizing actions and plans. J. of Logic and Computation, 3(5), 1993.
Marie Odile Cordier and Pierre Siegel. A temporal revision model for reasoning about world change. In Bernhard Nebel, Charles Rich, and William Swartout, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), pages 732–739. Morgan Kaufmamm, 1992.
Marie-Odile Cordier and Pierre Siegel. Prioritized transitions for updates. Technical Report 884, IRISA, Rennes, France, 1994.
Thomas Dean and Keiji Kanazawa. A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence, 5:142–150, 1989.
Matthew L. Ginsberg and D. E. Smith. Readings in Non Monotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Hirofumi Katsuno and Alberto O. Mendelzon. On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'91), pages 387–394, 1991.
John C. McCarthy and Patrick H. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence, volume 4, pages 463–502, New-York, 1969. American Elsevier.
Erik Sandewall. Features and Fluents (volume I). Oxford University Press, 1995.
Ken Satoh. Nonmonotonic reasoning by minimal belief revision. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems. ICOT, 1988.
Marianne Winslett. Reasoning about actions using a possible model approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh National AAAI Conference, pages 89–93, 1988.
Marianne Winslett. Sometimes updates are circumscription. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Conference, pages 859–863, Detroit, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cordier, MO., Siegel, P. (1995). Prioritized transitions for updates. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60112-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49438-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive