Skip to main content

Prioritized transitions for updates

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 946))

Abstract

An update operation presupposes that one can predict how the world changes along time. In the absence of a predictive model of evolution, the common sense law of inertia is usually used and justifies the minimal change approach to the frame problem. Instead of relying on an implicit modeling of persistence, we propose to use an explicit modeling of the expected evolution. We first explain why our previous proposal was not quite satisfactory. We then propose a model-driven semantics of the update operation which can take into account an explicit transition model. The transition model provides a more powerful and flexible way to represent the persistence of information. It can moreover be stressed that non only persistence information but also default and transition rules can be expressed in this transition model. It can then be used to represent evolutive systems as required for example in a monitoring or diagnosis context

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Gerhard Brewka and Joachim Hertzberg. How to do things with worlds: On formalizing actions and plans. J. of Logic and Computation, 3(5), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie Odile Cordier and Pierre Siegel. A temporal revision model for reasoning about world change. In Bernhard Nebel, Charles Rich, and William Swartout, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), pages 732–739. Morgan Kaufmamm, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie-Odile Cordier and Pierre Siegel. Prioritized transitions for updates. Technical Report 884, IRISA, Rennes, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Dean and Keiji Kanazawa. A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence, 5:142–150, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew L. Ginsberg and D. E. Smith. Readings in Non Monotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirofumi Katsuno and Alberto O. Mendelzon. On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'91), pages 387–394, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • John C. McCarthy and Patrick H. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence, volume 4, pages 463–502, New-York, 1969. American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erik Sandewall. Features and Fluents (volume I). Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ken Satoh. Nonmonotonic reasoning by minimal belief revision. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems. ICOT, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marianne Winslett. Reasoning about actions using a possible model approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh National AAAI Conference, pages 89–93, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marianne Winslett. Sometimes updates are circumscription. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Conference, pages 859–863, Detroit, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christine Froidevaux Jürg Kohlas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cordier, MO., Siegel, P. (1995). Prioritized transitions for updates. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49438-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics