Skip to main content

Discourse spaces: A pragmatic interpretation of contexts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory (ICCS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 954))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In human interactions the context in which verbal and non-verbal acts are performed has a prime importance. In this paper we propose an approach emphasizing the cognitive dimension of contexts. Our basic assumption is that a human agent naturally uses contextual information because she cannot manipulate or communicate knowledge without positioning herself relatively to that knowledge. We introduce the notion of discourse space (DS) a pragmatic form of context which is used to structure knowledge contained in a discourse. Discourse spaces are created, updated or evoked by an agent who tries to generate or understand a discourse. We extend the basic conceptual graph framework with notions like temporal objects, temporal localizations and different kinds of discourse spaces: situations, definitional and focal DSs. Then, we present agent-related DSs (narrator's and agent's perspectives, agent's attitudes) and inference-related discourse spaces (conditional, alternative, generalized, hypothetical and counterfactual DSs). We also show how these DSs are interleaved in the representation of a discourse.

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant OGP 05518) and FCAR. Many thanks to Claire Girard who has provided thoughtful suggestions that helped me clarify this work on discourse spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals.CACM, vol 26 n11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binnick, R.I. (1991). Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boury-Brisset, A.-C. & Moulin, B. (1994). Mise en oeuvre de raisonnements multiples dans un système multi-agent. Actes des Journées Intelligence Artificielle Distribuée et Systèmes Multi-agents. Voiron, France. Mai 1994, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Descles, J-P. (1989). State, Event, Process and Topology. General Linguistics, vol 29 n3 161–199, Pensylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dick, J. P. (1994). Using contexts to represent text. In [36].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dinsmore, J. (1987). Mental spaces from a functional perspective, Cognitive Science, vol 11, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dinsmore, J. (1991). Partitioned Representations. Berlin: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esch, J. (1993). Contexts as white box concepts. In proceedings of the First Int. Conf. on Conceptual Structures. Mineau, G. & Moulin, B. (Eds.). Quebec 1993. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Esch, J. (1994). Contexts and concepts: abstraction duals. In [36].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Findler, N. V. Edt. (1979). Associative Networks. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guha, R. V. (1991). Contexts: a Formalization and some applications. MCC tech.report ACT-CYC-423-91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hendrix, G. (1979). Encoding knowledge in partitioned networks. In [13]. 51–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janas, J. M. & Schwind, C. B. (1979). Extensional semantic networks: their representation, application and generation. In [12]. 267–302.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kocura, P. (1993). Towards a semantic of inchoactive and causation events in conceptual graphs. In [30].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuroda, S. Y. (1973). Where epistemology, style and grammar meet. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Langacker R. W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Stanford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: description and construction of text structures. In Kempen G. (Ed.), Natural Language Generation. Dordrecht: Martin Nijhoff. Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mineau, G. W., Moulin, B. & Sowa, J. F. (Eds.). Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation. Lecture Notes in A. I., 699. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moulin, B. (1992). A conceptual graph approach for representing temporal information in discourse. Knowledge-Based Systems. vo15 n3, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moulin, B. (1993a). Representing temporal knowledge in discourse: an approach extending the conceptual graph theory. In [30].

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moulin, B. (1993b). The representation of linguistic information in an approach used for modelling temporal knowledge in discourses. In [23].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moulin, B. & Dumas, S. (1994).The temporal structure of a discourse and verb tense determination. In [36].

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moulin, B. (1995). A pragmatic representational approach of context and reference in discourses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Structures ICCS'95, G. Ellis, R.A. Levinson, W. Rich, J. Sowa (Edts.). Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Palacas, A. L. (1993). Attribution semantics: linguistic worlds and point of view. Discourse Processes 16, 239–277.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pfeiffer, H. & Nagle, T. (Eds.) (1993). Conceptual Graph: Theory and Implementation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 754. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts, D.D. (1973). The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Searle, J. R. & Vanderveken D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shoham, Y. (1991). Varieties of contexts. In V. Lifschitz (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Mathematial Theory of Computation. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures. Reading Mas: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sowa, J. F. (1993). Logical foundations for representing object-oriented systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial intelligence.Vol.5 n.2, 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tepfenhart, W. M., Dick, J. P., & Sowa, J. F. (Edts.) (1994). Conceptual Structures: Current Practices. Lecture Notes in A.I. 835. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vendler Z. (1967). Verbs and times. In Z. Vendler ed., Linguistics and Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Willems, M. (1993). A conceptual semantics ontology for conceptual graphs. In [23].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerard Ellis Robert Levinson William Rich John F. Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moulin, B. (1995). Discourse spaces: A pragmatic interpretation of contexts. In: Ellis, G., Levinson, R., Rich, W., Sowa, J.F. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. ICCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 954. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60161-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49539-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics