Skip to main content

KBS maintenance as learning two-tiered domain representation

  • Scientific Sessions
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1010))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of improving problem-solving behavior of traditional KBS in the course of its real operation which is a part of the maintenance task. The solution of the problem is searched in integration of the KBS with a specially designed case-based reasoning module used for correcting solutions produced by the KBS. Special attention is paid to the methods of case matching and reconciling conflicts between CBR and RBR. The proposed solution for both problems is based on treating the maintenance task as a problem for learning two-tiered domain representation. From this view point rules form the first domain tier reflecting existing strong patterns in the representation of domain concepts, while the second tier is formed by the newly solved cases along with a special domain-dependent procedure for case matching. The main ideas of the approach are illustrated by the results of some experiments with the experimental system CoRCase.

This research was partially supported by National Science Foundation, Grant I-416/94

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A.: Knowledge-intensive, integrated approach to problem solving and sustained learning. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Trondheim (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agre, G.: Improvement of KBS Behavior by Using Problem-Solving Experience. Ph. Jorrand and V. Sgurev (Eds.), Proc. of the VIth Int. Conference AIMSA '94, World Scientific Publ., Singapore (1994) 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agre, G.: An Approach to Integration of Rule-Based and Case-Based Reasoning. Problems of Engineering Cybernetics and Robotics, 42, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia (1995) 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barsalou, L., Hale, C.: Components of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames. I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R.S. Michalsi and P. Theuns (Eds.) Categories and Concepts — Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, Academic Press (1993) 97–144.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergadano, F., Matwin, S., Michalski R.S., Zhang, J.: Learning two-tiered description of flexible concepts: the POSEIDON system. Machine Learning 8 (1992) 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biberman, Y.: A Contex Similarity Measure. F. Bergadano and L. De Raedt (Eds.) Machine Learning: ECML-94. LNAI 784, Springer-Verlag (1994) 48–63

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coenen, F., Bench-Capon, T.: Maintenance of Knowledge-Based Systems: Theory, Techniques and Tools, Academic Press (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golding A.R., Rosenbloom, P.S.: Improving rule-based systems through case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, MIT Press (1991) 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond, K.: Case-Based Planning: Viewing Planning as a Memory Task. Academic Press (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iordanova I., Giacometti, A., Vila, A., Amy, B., Reymond, F., Abaoub, L., Dahou M., Rialle, V.: Shade — A Hybrid System for Diagnosis in Electromyography. Proc. of IXth Int. Congress on Electromyography, Jerusalem (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolodner, J.L.: Extending problem solver capabilities through case-based inference. Proc. of 4th Workshop on Machine Learning, UC-Irvine, June 22–25 (1987) 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Markov, Z.: Private communication (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matwin, S., Plante, B.: A Deductive-Inductive Method For Theory Revision. R.S. Michalski and Gh. Tecuci (Eds.) Proc. of the First Int. Workshop on Multistrategy Learning (1991) Harpers Ferry, 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michalski R.S.: Learning flexible concepts: fundamental ideas and a method based on two-tiered representation. Y. Kodratoff and R.S. Michalski (Eds.) Machine Learning: an Artificial Intelligence Approach 3, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann (1990) 63–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, T.M., R. Keller, Kedar-Cabelli, S.: Explanation-Based Generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning 1 (1986) 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cost, S., Salzberg, S.: A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features. Machine Learning 10(1) (1991) 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stanfill, C., Waltz, D.: Toward memory-based reasoning. Communication of ACM 29(12) (1986) 1213–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, J.: Integrating Symbolic and Subsymbolic Approaches in Learning Flexible Concepts. R.S. Michalski and Gh. Tecuci (Eds.) Proc. of the First Int. Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, Harpers Ferry (1991) 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, J.: Selecting Typical Instances in Instance-Based Learning. D. Sleeman and P. Edwards (Eds.) Machine Learning — Proc. of the Ninth Int. Workshop (ML02), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann (1992) 470–479

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuela Veloso Agnar Aamodt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Agre, G. (1995). KBS maintenance as learning two-tiered domain representation. In: Veloso, M., Aamodt, A. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60598-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60598-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48446-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics