Skip to main content

Textual relations as part of multiple links between text segments

  • Issues in Discourse or Text Planning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 126 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1036))

Abstract

Many text planning systems are based on a theoretical linguistic approach which assumes the existence of relations between units of text. The relational approach most extensively used in text generation is the Rhetorical Structure Theory (rst, Mann and Thompson 1987). The phenomenon of multiple relations, i.e. the fact that in natural language texts we often find more than one relation holding between two text units, has not been treated by rst. In this paper we show how the taxonomy of discourse structure relations as proposed in Maier and Hovy (1991) can be exploited to account for a subtype of multiple relations. We also give an outline of a computational model to generate texts including multiple relations.

The author would like to thank John Bateman, Elena Not and Oliviero Stock for comments on previous versions of this paper. Much of this research was carried out while the author was a member of the Natural Language Processing Group at irst, Trento, Italy. This work was also partially funded by the German Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (BMFT) in the framework of the Verbmobil Project under grant 01IV101K/1. The responsibility for the contents of this study lies with the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bateman, J.A., Kasper, R.T., Moore, J.D., and Whitney, R.: The PENMAN Upper Model. Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J.A., Maier, E., Teich, E., and Wanner, L.: Towards an architecture for situated text generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Issues in Computational Linguistics, Penang, Malaysia, 1991. Also available as technical report of GMD/Institut für Integrierte Publikations-und Informationssysteme, Darmstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. and Rondhuis, K.J.: Coherence relations: analysis and specification, October 1994. DANDELION Deliverable R1.1.2:a,b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M.E., editors: Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R.: A computational theory of the function of clue words in argument understanding. In Proceedings of COLING-84, pages 251–258, Stanford, CA, July 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R.: Rhetoric and intentions in discourse. In Owen Rambow, editor, Proceedings of the ACL-93 workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, pages 5–6, Columbus, Ohio, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beaugrande, R.: Text, Discourse and Process. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B.A.: Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L.: Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Journal of Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R.: Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R.: Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3(1), 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höppner, W. and Horacek, H., editors: Report about the Dagstuhl Workshop on Principles in Natural Language Generation. Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, 1995. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H.: Planning coherent multisentential text. In Proceedings of the 26th ACL Conference, pages 179–186, Buffalo, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H.: In defense of syntax: Informational, intentional, and rhetorical structures in discourse. In Owen Rambow, editor, Proceedings of the ACL-93 workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, Columbus, Ohio, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H. and Arens, Y.: Automatic generation of formatted text. In Proceedings of the 10th AAAI Conference, Anaheim, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E., Lavid, J., Maier, E., Mittal, V., and Paris, C.: Employing knowledge resources in a new text planner architecture. In Robert Dale, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner, and Oliviero Stock, editors, Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation; Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing, pages 57–72. Springer, Berlin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E. and Maier, E.: Parsimonious and profligate approaches: How many and which discourse structure relations. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California. The PENMAN User Guide, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, A. and Asher, N.: Intentions and information in discourse. In Proceedings of ACL-94, Las Cruces, NM, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, E. and Hovy, E.: A metafunctionally motivated taxonomy for discourse structure relations. In Proc. of the 3rd European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Judenstein, Austria, March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, E.A. and Not, E.: Increasing cohesion in automatically generated natural language texts. In Piero Torasso, editor, Proceedings of the Third Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI * IA-93) Torino, Italy, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 728, Torino, Italy, October 1993. Springer Verlag. A more extensive version is available as Technical Report No. 9303-20, IRST, Trento-Povo, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, E. and Sitter, S.: An extension of Rhetorical Structure Theory for the treatment of retrieval dialogues. In Proc. of the 14th Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, Indiana, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.C., Moore, M.A., Levin, J.A., and Carlisle, J.H.: Observation methods for human dialogue. Technical Report ISI-RR-75-33, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical Structure Theory: A theory of text organization. In Livia Polanyi, editor, The Structure of Discourse. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R.: English Text: System and Structure. Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybury, M.T.: Planning Multisentential English Text Using Communicative Acts. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambdridge, GB, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, K.F.: Contextual effects on responses to misconceptions. In G. Kempen, editor, Natural Language Generation, pages 43–54. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, K.R.: Text generation — Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, GB, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D.: A Reactive Approach to Explanation in Expert and Advice-Giving Systems. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D. and Paris, C.L.: Planning text for advisory dialogues. In Proceedings of ACL, US Chapter, Vancouver, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D. and Pollack, M.E.: A problem for RST: the need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, pages 537–544, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaget, F.: Using a textual representation level component in the context of discourse and dialogue generation. In Robin Fawcett, Eduard Hovy, David McDonald, Marie Meteer, Donia Scott, and Koenraad deSmedt, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 127–136, Kennebunkport, Maine, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C.L.: Combining discourse strategies to generate descriptions to users along a naive/expert spectrum. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 626–632, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C.L. and Maier, E.A.: Knowledge resources or decisions? In IJCAI-91 Workshop on Decision Making throughout the Generation Process, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, E.: The modeling of text formatting for text generation. In Michael Zock, Giovanni Adorni, and Giacomo Ferrari, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 176–170, Pisa, Italy, April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passoneau, R.J. and Litman, D.J.: Intention-based segmentation: Human reliabilities and correlation with linguistic cues. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 148–155, 22–26 June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redeker, G.: Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M.S. and Noordman, L.G.M.: Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15(1):1–36, January–March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D.: Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teich, E., Degand, L. and Bateman, J.: Multilingual textuality: Some experiences from multilingual text generation. same volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W.: Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press, Inc., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, L.: Building another bridge over the generation gap. In Robin Fawcett, Eduard Hovy, David McDonald, Marie Meteer, Donia Scott, and Koenraad deSmedt, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 137–144, Kennebunkport, Maine, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Giovanni Adorni Michael Zock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maier, E. (1996). Textual relations as part of multiple links between text segments. In: Adorni, G., Zock, M. (eds) Trends in Natural Language Generation An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. EWNLG 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60800-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60800-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60800-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49457-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics