Skip to main content

Two gradient descent algorithms for blind signal separation

  • Oral Presentations: Sensory Processing Sensory Processing I: Classification
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1112))

Abstract

Two algorithms are derived based on the natural gradient of the mutual information of the linear transformed mixtures. These algorithms can be easily implemented on a neural network like system. Two performance functions are introduced based on the two approximation methods for evaluating the mutual information. These two functions depend only on the outputs and the de-mixing matrix. They are very useful in comparing the performance of different blind separation algorithms. The performance of the new algorithms is compared to that of some well known algorithms by using these performance functions. The new algorithms generally perform better because they minimize the mutual information directly. This is verified by the simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Amari. Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics, Lecture Notes in Statistics vol.28. Springer, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Amari, A. Cichocki, and H. H. Yang. Recurrent neural networks for blind separation of sources. In Proceedings 1995 International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and Applications, volume I, pages 37–42, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Amari, A. Cichocki, and H. H. Yang. A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 8, eds. David S. Touretzky, Michael C. Mozer and Michael E. Hasselmo, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. (to appear), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski. An information-maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7:1129–1159, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski. Fast blind separation based on information theory. In Proceedings 1995 International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and Applications, volume I, pages 43–47, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-F. Cardoso and Beate Laheld. Equivariant adaptive source separation. To appear in IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Comon. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Processing, 36:287–314, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Jutten and J. Herault. Blind separation of sources, part i: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture. Signal Processing, 24:1–10, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christoph von der Malsburg Werner von Seelen Jan C. Vorbrüggen Bernhard Sendhoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, H.H., Amari, S. (1996). Two gradient descent algorithms for blind signal separation. In: von der Malsburg, C., von Seelen, W., Vorbrüggen, J.C., Sendhoff, B. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 96. ICANN 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61510-5_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61510-5_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61510-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68684-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics