Skip to main content

On formation of exception hierarchy

  • Nonmonotonic Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1114))

Abstract

In this paper, the rule specifying exceptions is discussed by using a representation original to the authors, the exc-representation, which can afford to express the hierarchy for exceptions. The hierarchy represents a kind of preference for incomplete knowledge in the inference. To form the rules, we focus on the contradiction derived by exceptions. Thus the rules to define the contradictions are of great importance in this paper. We devote the former half of this paper to discuss the definition of the exc-representation. We classify exceptions into the two types: the exceptions based on general-specific relation and the exceptions based on co-existence relation. For each type we define its representation. In the latter half, we propose a method to form the rules for each type. For the exceptions based on general-specific relation, our method is based on the inheritance rule on taxonomic hierarchy. For the co-existence relation, we produce the additional rules and predicates if necessary before forming the rules.

This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for the Ministry of Education of Japan

Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Babaguchi, N., Ohara, K., Katsurada, K., and Kitahashi, T.: Knowledge Conversion Initiated by Contradiction, Proc.9th Annual Conference of JSAI(1995)53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M.R. and Nilsson, N.J.: Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann(1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konolige, K.: Hierarchic Autoepistemic Theory for Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Preliminary Report, Proc.2nd Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning(1988)42–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifschitz, V.: Benchmark Problems for Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Proc.2nd Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning(1988)202–219

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.: Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common-Sense Knowledge, Artif.Intell., Vol. 28(1986)89–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C.: Semantical Considerations on Non-Monotonic Logic, Artif.Intell., Vol. 25(1985)75–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohara, K., Babaguchi, N., and Kitahashi, T.: Acquiring Hierarchic Structure from Knowledge Including Exceptions, Proc.9th Annual Conference of JSAI(1995)61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohara, K., Babaguchi, N., and Kitahashi, T.: Relational Algebraic Representation for Query Procedure in Advanced Logical DataBase Handling Incomplete Knowledge, Trans.IPS.Japan, Vol. 36, No.6(1995)1433–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default Reasoning, Artif.Intell., Vol. 13, No.1/2(1980)81–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Norman Foo Randy Goebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ohara, K., Babaguchi, N., Kitahashi, T. (1996). On formation of exception hierarchy. In: Foo, N., Goebel, R. (eds) PRICAI'96: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61532-6_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61532-6_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61532-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68729-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics