Skip to main content

A system for computing constrained default logic extensions

  • Default Logics
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1126))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe the algorithmic foundations of the part of the program Exten responsible for the computation of extensions in Constrained Default Logic. Exten is a system that computes extensions for various default logics.

The efficiency of the system is increased by pruning techniques for the search tree. We motivate and present these techniques, and demonstrate that they can cut down the size of the search tree significantly. Quite importantly, they complement well the recently developed stratification method. This technique has to be modified to work properly with Constrained Default Logic, and we show how this can be done.

Exten supports experimentation with default logic, allowing the user to set various parameters. Also it has been designed to be open to future enhancements, which are supported by its object-oriented design. Exten is part of our long-term effort to develop an integrated toolkit for intelligent information management based on nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Antoniou. Nonmonotonic Reasoning with Incomplete and Changing Information. MIT Press 1996 (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Ben-Eliyahu and I. Niemela (eds.). Applications and Implementations of Nonmonotonic Reasoning Systems. Proceedings of the IJCAI-95 Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Brewka. Cumulative default logic: in defense of nonmonotonic inference rules. Artificial Intelligence 50, 2 (1991): 183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Cholewinski. Stratified Default Logic. In Proc. Computer Science Logic 1994, Springer LNCS 933, 456–470

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Cholewinski, W. Marek, A. Mikitiuk and M. Truszczynski. Experimenting with default logic. In Proc. ICLP-95, MIT Press 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. P. Courtney. Towards a Default Logic Workbench: Computing Extensions. Honours Thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Delgrande, T. Schaub and W.K. Jackson. Alternative Approaches to default logic. Artificial Intelligence 70 (1994): 167–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Hopkins. Orderings and Extensions. In Proc. ESQUARU'93, Springer 1993, LNAI 747

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Koutsofinos and S.C. North. Dot. Bell Laboratories, http://www.research.att.com/orgs/ssr/book/reuse

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Linke and T. Schaub. Lemma Handling in Default Logic Theorem Proving. In Proc. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, Springer 1995, LNAI 946, 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Lukaszewicz. Considerations of default logic: an alternative approach. Computational Intelligence 4, 1(1988): 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mikitiuk and M. Truszczynski. Constrained and rational default logics. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1995

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Poole. A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 36 (1988): 27–47

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1980): 81–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Risch and C. Schwind. Tableau-Based Characterization and Theorem Proving for Default Logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning 13 (1994): 223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Schaub. On Constrained Default Theories. In Proc. ECAI-92, Wiley 1992, 304–308

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Schaub. A new methodology for query-answering in default logics via structure-oriented theorem proving. Journal of Automated Reasoning 15, 1 (1995): 95–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Schlechta. Directly Sceptical Inheritance cannot Capture the Intersection of Extensions. In Proc. GMD Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, GMD 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Wallace. Proof Truncation Techniques in Model Elimination TableauBased Theorem Proving. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Newcastle 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

José Jülio Alferes Luís Moniz Pereira Ewa Orlowska

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Antoniou, G., Courtney, A.P., Ernst, J., Williams, M.A. (1996). A system for computing constrained default logic extensions. In: Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M., Orlowska, E. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1126. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61630-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70643-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics