Abstract
This paper presents a logical system, CIU LDS, as a labelled realization to our approach of Compromising Interfering Updates. The approach proposes a method for handling logically conflicting inputs into knowledge bases, via restricting their consequences. The main idea is to update the database with as many consistent consequences of the inputs as possible, in the case that the inputs themselves are not allowed to be kept in it. And in the case that a revision applies, the idea is to keep as many as possible of the consistent consequences of the retracted sentences as a compromise. 1 The reconciliation of conflicting inputs follows some specified postulates for compromised revision.
CIULDS is based on the Labelled Deductive Systems framework (LDS). In CIULDS we take advantage of LDS's labelling facility, to control the derivation process of the compromised consequences. We embed in the labelling propagation conditions, which act on the inference rules, part of the control mechanism for the compromised approach. This mechanism helps the update operations to perform the reconciliation of conflicting inputs. The update operations invoke a specific revision method, which applies some compromising criteria for achieving the revised labelled database, whenever conflicts arise.
In this paper, we present briefly our main motivations and we introduce the specification of our approach, for the case of database updates. We present CIU LDS, by decribing informally its main features and definitions. Finally, we summarize the system's main properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, C., Makinson, D.: The Logic of Theory Change: Contraction functions and their associated functions. Theoria. 48 (1982).
Alchourrón, C., Makinson, D.: On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contractions. Studia Logica. 44 (1985).
Alchourrón, C., Makinson, D.: Maps between some different kinds of contractions functions. Studia Logica. 45 (1986).
Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the Logic of Theory Change: partial meet functions for contraction and revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic. 50 (1985).
Boutilier, C., Goldszmidt, M.: Revision by Conditionals Beliefs. Proc. AAAI Conference. (1993).
Cholvy, L.: Proving Theorems in a Multi-Source Environment. Proc. IJCAI-93, Chambery. Vol.1 (1993) 66–71.
Dargam, F.C.C.: Compromised Updates in Deductive Databases. Research Report, Imperial College, UK. (1996).
Dargam, F.C.C.: On Compromising Updates in Labelled Databases. Imperial College-Department of Computing Research Report DoC-96/2. (1996).
Dargam, F.C.C.: A Compromised Characterization to Belief Revision. Imperial College-Department of Computing Research Report DoC-96/1. (1996).
Dargam, F.C.C.: On Reconciling Conflicting Updates: A Compromised Revision Approach. PhD. Thesis. Department of Computing, Imperial College, UK. (1996-to appear).
Dargam, F.C.C., Gabbay, D.M.: Resolving Conflicting Actions and Updates. (extended abstract). Proc. Compulog Net Meeting on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning CNKRR'93. Lisbon. (1993).
Doyle, J.: A Truth Maintenance System. Artificial Intelligence. 12 (1979) 231–272.
Elkan, C.: A Rational Reconstruction of Non-monotonic Truth Maintenance Systems. Artificial Intelligence. 43(2) (1990) 219–234.
Freund, M., Lehmann, D.: Belief Revision and Rational Inference. Technical Report TR94-1. Institute of Computer Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Israel (1994).
Gabbay, D.M.: LDS — Labelled Deductive Systems — Volume I Foundations. (Intermediate draft of a forthcoming book by Oxford University Press). MPI-I-94-223. Max-Planck-Institut fur Informatik. Saarbrucken, Germany.(1994).
Gabbay, D.M., Hunter, A.: Making Inconsistency Respectable — Part 1: A Logical Framework for Inconsistency in Reasoning. Fundamentals of AI Research. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 535 (1991).
Gabbay, D.M., Hunter, A.: Making Inconsistency Respectable — Part 2: Meta-level handling of inconsistency. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 747 (1993).
Galliers, J.: The Positive Role of Conflict in Cooperative Multiagent Systems. Decentralized AI. Demazeau, Y., Muller, J.P., eds. North-Holland. (1990) 33–46.
Giordano, L., Martelli, A.: An Abductive Characterization of the TMS. Springer-Verlag, LNAI 515. Proc. TMS ECAI-90. Martins, J.P., Reinfrank, M., eds. (1990).
Jackson,P., Pais, J.: Semantic Accounts of Belief Revision. Springer-Verlag, LNAI 515. Proc. TMS ECAI-90. Martins, J.P., Reinfrank, M., eds. (1990).
Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising it. Belief Revision. Gärdenfors, P., editor. Cambridge University Press. (1992) 183–203.
Kleer, J.d.: An Assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence. 28 (1986) 127–162.
Makinson, D.: How to give it up. Synthese. 62 (1985).
Makinson, D.: Five Faces of Minimality. Studia Logica. 53(3) (1993).
Monteiro, D., Bertino, E., Martelli, M.: Transactions and Updates in Deductive Databases. Imperial College-Department of Computing Research Report DoC-95/2. (1995).
Nebel, B.: A Knowledge level Analysis of Belief Revision. Proc. 1st. Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (1989).
Nebel, B.: Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems. Chapter 6-Belief Revision. Springer-Verlag, LNAI 422 (1990).
A Truth Maintenance System Based on Stable Models. Pimentel, S. G., Cuadrado, J. L.: Proc. North American Conference on Logic Programming NACLP. Cleveland, USA. (1989) 274–290.
Rao, A., Foo, N.: Minimal Change and Maximal Coherence: A Basis for Belief Revision and Reasoning about Actions. Proc. 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1989) 966–971.
Rodi, W., Pimentel, S.: A Nonmonotonic Assumption-Based TMS using Stable Bases. Proc. KR'91. (1991) 485–495.
Rott, H.: Two Methods of Constructing Contractions and Revisions of Knowledge Systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 20 (1991).
Rott, H.: On the Logic of Theory Change: more maps between different kinds of contractions functions. Belief Revision. Gärdenfors, P., editor. Cambridge University Press. (1992) 122–141.
Sripada, S.: A Temporal Approach to Belief Revision in Knowledge Bases. Proc. 9th. IEEE Conference on AI for Applications CAIA-93. Florida, USA. (1993).
Wagner, G.: Vivid Logic. Springer Verlag, LNAI 764 (1994).
Wang, X., Chen, H.: On the Semantics of TMS. Proc. IJCAI '91. (1991) 306–309.
Winslett, M.: Updating Logical Databases. Cambridge University Press. (1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dargam, F.C.C. (1996). Compromised updates in labelled databases. In: Calmet, J., Campbell, J.A., Pfalzgraf, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Mathematical Computation. AISMC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1138. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61732-9_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61732-9_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61732-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70740-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive