Skip to main content

Shape constancy in pictorial relief

  • Appearance-Based Representations
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Object Representation in Computer Vision II (ORCV 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1144))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We measured pictorial relief for a series of pictures of a smooth solid object. The scene was geometrically identical (i.e., the perspective of the same 3D scene) for all pictures, the rendering different. Some of the pictures were monochrome full scale photographs taken under different illuminations of the scene. We also included a silhouette (uniform black on uniform white) and a “cartoon” style rendering (visual contour and key linear features rendered in thin black line on a uniform white ground). Two subjects were naive and started with the silhouette, next did the cartoon, finally the full scale photographs. Another subject had seen the object and did the experiment in the opposite sequence. The silhouette rendering is impoverished,but has considerable relief with much of the basic shape. The cartoon rendering yields well developed pictorial relief, even in the naive subjects. Shading adds only small local details, but different illuminations produce significant alterations of relief. We conclude that shape constancy under changes in illumination rules throughout, but that the (small) deviations from true constancy reveal the effect of cues such as shading in a natural setting. Such a “perturbation analysis” appears more promising than either stimulus reduction or cue conflict paradigms.

An earlier version of this paper was published in Perception, volume 5, 1996. This paper is included in this volume by kind permission of Pion Ltd. Jan Koenderink is supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program. Andrea van Doorn is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Chris Christou is supported by the ESPRIT Basic Research Action INSIGHT of the European Commission. Joe Lappin visited Utrecht for two months and was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bülthoff H B, Mallot H O, 1988 “Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading” J.Opt.Soc.Am. A5 1749–1757

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clifton J, 1973 The eye of the artist (Westport, Conn.: North Light Publishers)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erens R G F, Kappers A M L, Koenderink J J, 1991 “Limits on the perception of local shape from shading”, in Studies in Perception and Action Eds P J Beek, R J Bootsma, P C W van Wieringen (Amsterdam) pp. 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  4. Erens R G F, Kappers A M L, Koenderink J J, 1993a “Perception of local shape from shading” Perception & Psychophysics 54 (2) 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erens R G F, Kappers A M L, Koenderink J J, 1993b “Estimating local shape from shading in the presence of global shading” Perception & Psychophysics 54 (3) 334–342

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adams R M, 1974 The roman stamp. Frame and facade in some forms of neo-classicism (Berkeley: University of California Press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gombrich E H, 1982 The image and the eye, further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation (Oxford: Phaidon)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hale N C, 1980 Abstraction in Art and Nature (New York: Watson-Guptill)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hattersley R, 1979 Photographic lighting, learning to see (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hogarth B, 1981 Dynamic light and shade (New York: Watson-Guptill)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter F, Fuqua P Light, Science and Magic, an introduction to photographic lighting (Boston: Focal Press)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs T S, 1988 Light for the artist (New York: Watson-Guptill)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston E E, 1991 “Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis” Vis.Res. 31 1351–1360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koenderink J J, Doorn A J van, 1995 “Relief: Pictorial and otherwise” Image and Vision Computing 13 (5) 321–334

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koenderink J J, Doorn A J van, Kappers A M L, 1992 “Surface perception in pictures” Perception and Psychophysics 32 487–496

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koenderink J J, Doorn A J van, Kappers A M L, 1994 “On so-called paradoxical monocular stereoscopy” Perception 23 583–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lomazzo P, 1958, in: A documentary history of art Vol.II, Ed. E G Holt (Garden City, New York: Doubleday)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nurnberg W, 1948 Lighting for portraiture (London: The Focal Press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pirenne M H, 1970 Optics, Painting and photography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramachandran V, 1988 “Shape from shading” Nature 331 Januari 14th

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schöne W, 1954 Über das Licht in der Malerei (Berlin: Gebr.Mann Verlag)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Todd J J, Akerstrom R A, 1987 JEP: Human Perc. and Performance 13(2) 242–255

    Google Scholar 

  23. Truxal J G, 1955 Automatic feedback control system synthesis (New York: McGraw-Hill)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean Ponce Andrew Zisserman Martial Hebert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J., Christou, C., Lappin, J.S. (1996). Shape constancy in pictorial relief. In: Ponce, J., Zisserman, A., Hebert, M. (eds) Object Representation in Computer Vision II. ORCV 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1144. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61750-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61750-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61750-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70673-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics