Skip to main content

An organized society of autonomous knowledge discovery agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cooperative Information Agents (CIA 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1202))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We have been developing a methodology and system for autonomous knowledge discovery and data mining from global information sources. The key issue is how to increase both autonomy and versatility of our discovery system. Our methodology is to create an organized society of autonomous knowledge discovery agents. This means (1) to develop many kinds of knowledge discovery and data mining agents (KDD agents in short) for different objects; (2) to use the KDD agents in multiple learning phases in a distributed cooperative mode; (3) to manage the society of the KDD agents by multiple meta-control levels. Based on this methodology, a multi-strategy and cooperative discovery system, which can be imagined as a softbot and is named GLS (Global Learning Scheme), has being developing by us. This paper briefly describes our methodology and the framework of our GLS system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chow, G.C. 1960. Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica, 28(3).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Durfee,E.H. and Lesser,V.R. 1989. Negotiating Task Decomposition and Allocation using Partial Global Planning. Distributed Artificial Intelligence Vol.2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fayyad,U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro,G et al (eds.) 1996. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Langley, P. & Zytkow, J.M. 1989. Data-Driven Approaches to Empirical Discovery. Artificial Intelligence, 40(1–3):283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, C. and Conradi, R. 1993. Automatic Replanning of Task Networks for Process Evolution in EPOS. Proc. the 4th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC'93), LNCS 717, Springer Verlag, pp.437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matheus, C.J., Chan, P.K. & Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. 1993. Systems for Knowledge Discovery in Databases. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 5(6):904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michalski, R.S. et al. 1992. Mining for Knowledge in Databases: The INLEN Architecture, Initial Implementation and First Results. J. of Intell. Infor. Sys., KAP, 1(1):85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Minsky,M. 1986 The Society of Mind, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.M. Mitchell. Generalization as Search. Artificial Intelligence, Vol.18 (1982) 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohsuga, S. 1970. On the Value of Information and Decision Making. Information Processing in Japan, Vol.10, pp.97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohsuga, S. & Yamauchi, H. 1985. Multi-Layer Logic — A Predicate Logic Including Data Structure as Knowledge Representation Language. New Generation Computing, 3(4):403–439.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohsuga, S. 1990. Framework of Knowledge Based Systems. Knowl. Based Sys., 3(4):204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohsuga, S. 1995. A Way of Designing Knowledge Based Systems. Knowledge Based Systems, 8(4):211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohsuga, S. Symbol Processing by Non-Symbol Processor. Proc. 4th Pacific Rim Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI'96) (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. & Frawley, W.J. (eds.). 1991. Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A. & Ando, A. 1961. Aggregation of Variables in Dynamic Systems. Econometrica, 29:111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang,X. 1996. Co-scheduling Parallel Workloads across Networks of Workstations, invited talk at Yamaguchi Univ. Japan, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1992. GLS — A Methodology for Discovering Knowledge from Databases. Proc. 13th Int. CODATA Conf. entitled “New Data Challenges in Our Information Age”, A20–A30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1993. HML — An Approach for Managing/Refining Knowledge Discovered from Databases. Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artif. Intell. (TAI'93), 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1994a. Discovering Concept Clusters by Decomposing Databases. Data & Knowl. Eng., Elsevier Science Publishers, 12(2):223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1994b. The GLS Discovery System: Its Goal, Architecture and Current Results. Proc. 8th Inter. Symp. on Methodologies for Intell. Sys. (ISMIS'94). LNAI 869, Springer, 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1994c. IIBR — A System for Managing/Refining Structural Characteristics Discovered from Databases. Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artif. Intell. (TAI'94), 468–475.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhong, N. & Ohsuga, S. 1995a. KOSI — An Integrated System for Discovering Functional Relations from Databases. J. of Intell. Infor. Sys., KAP, 5(1):20–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1995b. “Toward A Multi-Strategy and Cooperative Discovery System”, Proc First Inter. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-95), AAAI Press, 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1996a. “System for Managing and Refining Structural Characteristics Discovered from Databases”, Knowledge Based Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, 9(4):267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1996b. “A Multi-Step Process for Discovering, Managing and Refining Strong Functional Relations Hidden in Databases”, Proc. 9th Inter. Symp. on Methodologies for Intell. Sys. (ISMIS'96). LNAI 1079, Springer, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1996c. “A Hierarchical Model Learning Approach for Refining and Managing Concept Clusters Discovered from Databases”, Data & Knowl. Eng., Elsevier Science Publishers, 20(2): 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1996d. “Using Generalizations Distribution Tables as a Hypothesis Search Space for Generalization”, Proc. 4th Int. W. on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, and Machine Discovery (RSFD'96) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhong,N. and Ohsuga,S. 1996e. “Representing Generalizations Distribution Tables by Connectionist Networks for Evolutionary Rule Discovery”, Proc. 1996 Asian Fuzzy Systems Symposium edited in the invited session on Rough Sets and Data Mining (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zytkow, J.M. 1993. Introduction: Cognitive Autonomy in Machine Discovery. Machine Learning, KAP, 12(1–3):7–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter Kandzia Matthias Klusch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhong, N., Kakemoto, Y., Ohsuga, S. (1997). An organized society of autonomous knowledge discovery agents. In: Kandzia, P., Klusch, M. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents. CIA 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1202. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62591-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62591-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62591-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68321-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics