Supported in part by NSF under grants CCR-9504205 and CCR-9357851.
The original version of this chapter was revised. A correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/3-540-63104-6_45
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barth, P., A Davis-Putnam based enumeration algorithm for linear pseudo-Boolean optimization, Technical Report MPI-I-95-2-003, Max-Plank-Institut fur Informatik, 1995.
Crawford, J., Auton, L., (1993) Experimental results on the cross-over point in satisfiability problems. In Proc. of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), pp. 22–28.
Davis, M., G. Logemann, and D. Loveland. A machine program for theorem-proving. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 5, 7 (July 1962), 394–397.
Dubois, O, Andre, P., Boufkhan, Y., Carlier, J., SAT versus UNSAT, see [6].
(1995) Freeman, J.W., Improvements to propositional satisfiability search algorithms. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania.
Johnson, D.S., Trick, M.A., (eds.) The second DIMACS implementation challenge, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (see http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/challenges/)
(1980) McAllester, D.A., An outlook on truth maintenance, AI Memo 551, MIT AI laboratory.
Pretolani, D., Efficiency and stability of hypergraph SAT algorithms, see [6].
Silva, J.P.M., Sakallah, K.A., Conflict analysis in search algorithms for propositional satisfiability. Technical Reports, Cadence European Laboraties, ALGOS, INESC, Lisboa, Portugal, May 1996.
Stallman, R.M., Sussman, G.J., (1977) Forward reasoning and dependency-directed backtracking in a system for computer-aided circuit analysis. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, 135–196
Stephan, P.R., Brayton, R.K., Sangiovanni-Binventelli, Combinational test generation using satisfiability, Memo no. UCS/ERL M92/112, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, Oct. 1992.
Zhang, H., SATO: A decision procedure for propositional logic. Association for Automated Reasoning Newsletter, 22, 1–3, March 1993.
Zhang, H., Bonacina, M.P., Hsiang, H.: (1996) PSATO: a distributed propositional prover and its application to quasigroup problems. To appear in Journal of Symbolic Computation.
Zhang, H., Stickel, M. (1994) Implementing the Davis-Putnam algorithm by tries. Technical Report, Dept. of Computer Science, The University of Iowa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, corrected publication 2019
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, H. (1997). SATO: An efficient propositional prover. In: McCune, W. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-14. CADE 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1249. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63104-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63104-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63104-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69140-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive