Skip to main content

Randomization and nondeterminism are comparable for ordered read-once branching programs

  • Session 3: Computational Complexity
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1256))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In [3] we exhibited a simple boolean functions f n in n variables such that:

  1. 1)

    f n can be computed by polynomial size randomized ordered read-once branching program with one sided small error;

  2. 2)

    any nondeterministic ordered read-once branching program that computes f n has exponential size.

In this paper we present a simple boolean function g n in n variables such that:

  1. 1)

    g n can be computed by polynomial size nondeterministic ordered read-once branching program;

  2. 2)

    any two-sided error randomized ordered read-once branching program that computes f n has exponential size.

These mean that BPP and NP are incomparable in the context of ordered read-once branching program.

Work done in part while visiting Steklov Mathematical Institute in Moscow. The research supported by Russia Fund for Basic Research 96-01-01962.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Ablayev, Lower bounds for one-way probabilistic communication complexity and their application to space complexity, Theoretical Computer Science, 157, (1996), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Ablayev and M. Karpinski, On the power of randomized branching programs, in Proceedings of the ICALP'96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 1099, (1996), 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Ablayev and M. Karpinski, On the power of randomized branching programs, manuscript (generalization of ICALP'96 paper results for the case of pure boolean function), available at http://www.ksu.ru/∼ablayev

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bryant, Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary decision diagrams, ACM Computing Surveys, 24, No. 3, (1992), 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Borodin, A. Razborov, and R. Smolensky, On lower bounds for read-k-times branching programs, Computational Complexity, 3, (1993), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Breitbart, H. Hunt III, and D. Rosenkratz, On the size of binary decision diagrams representing Boolean functions, Theoretical Computer Science, 145, (1995), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Dias da Silva and Y. Hamidoune, Cyclic spaces for Grassmann derivatives and additive theory, Bull. London Math. Soc., 26, (1994), 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ponsio, A lower bound for integer multiplication with read-once branching programs, Proceedings of the 27-th STOC, (1995), 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Razborov, Lower bounds for deterministic and nondeterministic branching programs, in Proceedings of the FCT'91, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 529, (1991), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sauerhoff, Lower bounds for the RP-OBDD-Size, manuscript, personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Savicky, S. Zak, A large lower bound for 1-branching programs, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Revision 01 of TR96-036, (1996), available at http://www.eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc/

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Savicky, S. Zak, A hierarchy for (1, +k)-branching programs with respect to k, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, TR96-050, (1996), available at http://www.eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc/

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Simon and M. Szegedy, A new lower bound theorem for read-only-once branching programs and its applications, Advances in Computational Complexity Theory, ed. Jin-Yi Cai, DIMACS Series, 13, AMS (1993), 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Wegener, The complexity of Boolean functions. Wiley-Teubner Series in Comp. Sci., New York-Stuttgart, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Wegener, Efficient data structures for boolean functions, Discrete Mathematics, 136, (1994), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. C. Yao, Some Complexity Questions Related to Distributive Computing, in Proc. of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, (1979), 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pierpaolo Degano Roberto Gorrieri Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ablayev, F. (1997). Randomization and nondeterminism are comparable for ordered read-once branching programs. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_177

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_177

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63165-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69194-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics