Abstract
This paper focuses upon the content and the level of granularity at which representations for the mental world should be placed in case-based explainers that employ introspective reasoning. That is, for a case-based reasoning system to represent thinking about the self, about the states and processes of reasoning, at what level of detail should one attempt to declaratively capture the contents of thought? Some claim that a mere set of two mental primitives are sufficient to represent the utterances of humans concerning verbs of thought such as “I forgot his birthday.” Alternatively, many in the CBR community have built systems that record elaborate traces of reasoning, keep track of knowledge dependencies or inference, or encode much metaknowledge concerning the structure of internal rules and defaults. The position here is that a system should be able instead to capture enough details to represent causally a common set of reasoning failure symptoms. I propose a simple model of expectation-driven reasoning, derive a taxonomy of reasoning failures from the model, and present a declarative representation of the failure symptoms that have been implemented in a CBR simulation. Such representations enable a system to explain reasoning failures by mapping from symptoms of the failures to causal factors involved.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cox, M. T. (1997). Loose Coupling of Failure Explanation and Repair: Using learning goals to sequence learning methods. This volume.
Cox, M. T. (1996). Introspective multistrategy learning: Constructing a learning strategy under reasoning failure. Doctoral dissertation, Technical Report, GIT-CC-96-06, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. (Available at URL ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu/pub/ai/rani/git-cc-96-06.html)
Cox, M. T., & Ram, A. (1995). Interacting learning-goals: Treating learning as a planning task. In J.-R Haton, M. Keane & M. Manago (Eds.), Advances in case-based reasoning: Second European Workshop, EWCBR-94 (pp. 60–74). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Doyle, J. (1979). A truth maintenance system, Artificial Intelligence, 12, 231–272.
Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1992). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. In T. O. Nelson (Ed.), Metacognition: Core readings (pp. 185–195). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. (Original work published in 1982)
Krinsky, R., & Nelson, T. O. (1985). The feeling of knowing for different types of retrieval failure. Acta Psychologica, 58, 141–158.
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's Judgements of Learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect.” Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–270.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ram, A. (1993). Indexing, elaboration and refinement: Incremental learning of explanatory cases. Machine Learning, 10, 201–248.
Ram, A. (1994). AQUA: Questions that drive the understanding process. In R. C. Schank, A. Kass, & C. K. Riesbeck (Eds.), Inside case-based explanation (pp. 207–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Schank, R. C. (1975). Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns. Hillsdale: LEA.
Schank, R. C., Goldman, N., Rieger, C. K., & Riesbeck, C. (1972). Primitive concepts underlying verbs of thought (Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project Memo No. 162). Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ., Computer Science Dept. (NTIS No. AD744634)
Schank, R. C., Kass, A., & Riesbeck, C. K. (1994). Inside case-based explanation. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Fabricius, W. V., Noyes, C. R., Bigler, K., D., & Alexander, J. M. (1994). The organization of mental verbs and folk theories of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 376–395.
Stallman, R. M., & Sussman, G. J. (1977). Forward reasoning and dependency-directed backtracking in a system for computer-aided circuit analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 9, 135–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cox, M.T. (1997). An explicit representation of reasoning failures. In: Leake, D.B., Plaza, E. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63233-6_493
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63233-6_493
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63233-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69238-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive