Skip to main content

Coordinating mobile agents via blackboards and access rights

  • Regular Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination Languages and Models (COORDINATION 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1282))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

LLinda (Locality based Linda) is a variant of Linda which supports a programming paradigm where agents can migrate from one computing environment to another. In this paper, we define a type system for LLinda that permits statically checking access rights violations of mobile agents. Types are used to describe processes intentions (read, write, execute, ...) relatively to the different localities they are willing to interact with or they want to migrate to. The type system is used to determine the operations that processes want to perform at each locality, to check whether they comply with the declared intentions and whether they have the necessary rights to perform the intended operations at the specific localities.

Work partially supported by EEC: HCM project EXPRESS and Esprit Working Group CONFER2, by CNR Integrated Project “Metodi e Strumenti per la Progettazione e la Verifica di Sistemi Eterogenei Connessi mediante Reti di Comunicazione” and Progetto Speciale “Modelli e Metodi per la Matematica e l'Ingegneria”, and by Istituto di Elaborazione dell'Informazione CNR, Pisa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Busi, R. Gorrieri, G. Zavattaro. A Process Algebraic View of Linda Coordination Primitives. Theoretical Computer Science. (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cardelli. A language with distributed scope. Computing Systems, 8(1):27–59, MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Carriero, D. Gelernter. Linda in Context. Communications of the ACM, 32(4):444–458, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Ciancarini, R. Gorrieri, G. Zavattaro. Towards a Calculus for Generative Communication. Proc. FMOODS'96, pp.283–297, Chapman & Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Ciancarini, K.K. Jensen, D. Yankelevich. On the Operational Semantics of a Coordination Language. Proc. Object-Based Models and Languages for Concurrent Systems, LNCS 924, pp.77–106, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. De Nicola, G.-L. Ferrari, R. Pugliese. Locality based Linda: programming with explicit localities. Proc. TAPSOFT'97, LNCS 1214, pp.712–726, Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. De Nicola, R. Pugliese. A Process Algebra based on Linda. Proc. COORDINATION'96, LNCS 1061, pages 160–178, Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Gelernter. Generative Communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1):80–112, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Giacalone, P. Mishra, S. Prasad. Facile: A symmetric integration of concurrent and functional programming. Int. Journal of Parallel Programming, 18(2), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ingolfsdottir. Semantic Models for Communicating Processes with Value-Passing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Kobayashi, B. Pierce and D. Turner. Linearity and the π-calculus. In Proc. POPL'96, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall Int., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Milner, J. Parrow, D. Walker. A calculus of mobile processes, (Part I and II). Information and Computation, 100:1–77, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Pierce and D. Sangiorgi. Typing and subtyping for mobile processes. Proc. LICS'93, IEEE-Press, 1993 (to appear in Mathematical Struct. in Comp. Science)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.D. Plotkin. Lectures notes in domain theory. University of Edinburgh, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Pugliese. Semantic Theories for Asynchronous Languages. Ph.D. Thesis VIII-96-6, Univ. di Roma “La Sapienza”, Dip. Scienze dell'Informazione, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Reppy. Higher Order Concurrency. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun Microsystems. The Java Language: A white paper. White Paper, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Thomsen, L. Leth, A. Giacalone. Some Issues in the Semantics of Facile Distributed Programming. REX Workshop “Semantics: Foundations and Applications”, LNCS 666, Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Volpano, G. Smith. A typed-based approach to program security. Proc. TAPSOFT'97, LNCS 1214, pp.607–621, Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.E. White. Telescript Technology: The Foundation for the Electronic Market Place. General Magic White Paper, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. General Magic. Telescript Technology: Mobile Agents. White Paper, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Garlan Daniel Le Métayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G., Pugliese, R. (1997). Coordinating mobile agents via blackboards and access rights. In: Garlan, D., Le Métayer, D. (eds) Coordination Languages and Models. COORDINATION 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1282. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63383-9_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63383-9_83

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63383-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69527-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics