Skip to main content

Rules for abstraction

  • Session I
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computing Science — ASIAN'97 (ASIAN 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1345))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Abstraction techniques for the verification of reactive systems promise to provide a theoretical basis for the integration of automatic and interactive proof techniques. In this paper, we give an account of homomorphic abstraction by studying a series of proof rules in Lamport's Temporal Logic of Actions. We believe that the main advantage of a logical formalization of abstraction is that it points towards more refined abstraction techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate two novel techniques that appear helpful in the verification of liveness properties over abstract models.

This work was supported by a grant from the state of Bavaria (Bayerischer Habilitations-Förderpreis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Martín Abadi and Leslie Lamport. The existence of refinement mappings. Theoretical Computer Science, 81(2):253–284, May 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin Abadi and Stephan Merz. On TLA as a logic. In Manfred Broy, editor, Deductive Program Design, NATO ASI series F, pages 235–272. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Bensalem, Y. Lakhnech, and H. Saidi. Powerful techniques for the automatic generation of invariants. In Rajeev Alur and Thomas A. Henzinger, editors, Computer Aided Verification: 8th International Conference, volume 1102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 323–335. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nikolaj Bjørner, Anca Browne, Edward Chang, Michael Colón, Arjun Kapur, Zohar Manna, Henny B. Sipma, and Tomás E. Uribe. STeP: deductive-algorithmic verification of reactive and real-time systems. In Rajeev Alur and Thomas A. Henzinger, editors, Computer Aided Verification: 8th International Conference, volume 1102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 415–418. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmund M. Clarke, Orna Grumberg, and David E. Long. Model checking and abstraction. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 16(5):1512–1542, September 1994. A preliminary version appeared in POPL 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patrick Cousot and Radhia Cousot. Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In 4th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 238–252, Los Angeles, California, 1977. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis Dams, Orna Grumberg, and Rob Gerth. Abstract interpretation of reactive systems: Abstractions preserving VCTL, ECTL and CTL. In Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog, editor, Programming Concepts, Methods, and Calculi (PROCOMET '94), pages 561–581, Amsterdam, 1994. IFIP Transactions, North Holland/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Dingel and T. Filkorn. Model checking for infinite state systems using data abstraction, assumption-commitment style reasoning and theorem proving. In Computer-Aided Verification, volume 939 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 1995. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Susanne Graf and Hassan Saidi. Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In Orna Grumberg, editor, Computer Aided Verification: 9th International Conference, volume 1254 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 72–83. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klaus Havelund and Natarajan Shankar. Experiments in theorem proving and model checking for protocol verification. In Marie-Claude Gaudel and Jim Woodcock, editors, Formal Methods Europe, pages 662–681, Berlin, March 1996. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hermann Hellwagner. Scalable readers/writers synchronization on shared-memory machines. Technical report, Siemens AG, ZFE ST SN 2, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert P. Kurshan. Analysis of discrete event coordination. In J.W. de Bakker, W.P. de Roever, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Proceedings REX Workshop on Stepwise Refinement of Distributed Systems: Models, Formalisms, Correctness, volume 430 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 414–454. Springer-Verlag, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leslie Lamport. What good is temporal logic? In R. E. A. Mason, editor, Information Processing 83: Proceedings of the IFIP 9th World Congress, pages 657–668, Paris, September 1983. IFIP, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leslie Lamport. The Temporal Logic of Actions. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 16(3):872–923, May 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leslie Lamport and Lawrence C. Paulson. Should your specification language be typed? Research Report 147, Digital Equipment Corporation, Systems Research Center, Palo Alto, California, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Claire Loiseaux, Susanne Graf, Joseph Sifakis, Ahmed Bouajjani, and Saddek Bensalem. Property preserving abstractions for the verification of concurrent systems. Formal Methods in System Design, 6:11–44, 1995. A preliminary version appeared as Spectre technical report RTC40, Grenoble, France, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stephan Merz. Isabelle/TLA. Available on the WWW at URL http://www4. informatik.tu-muenchen.de/-merz/isabelle/, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olaf Müller and Tobias Nipkow. Combining model checking and deduction for I/O-automata. In Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 1019 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–16. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ulrich Nitsche and Pierre Wolper. Relative liveness and behavior abstraction. In Principles of Distributed Computing. ACM Press, 1997. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sam Owre, John Rushby, Natarajan Shankar, and Friedrich von Henke. Formal verification for fault-tolerant architectures: Prolegomena to the design of PVS. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(2):107–125, February 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawrence C. Paulson. Isabelle: A Generic Theorem Prover, volume 828 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joseph Sifakis. Property preserving homomorphisms of transition systems. In Edmund M. Clarke and Dexter Kozen, editors, 4th Workshop on Logics of Programs, volume 164 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–473. Springer-Verlag, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernhard Steifen, Kim G. Larsen, and Carsten Weise. A constraint oriented proof methodology based on modal transition systems. In Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 1019 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 17–40. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfgang Thomas. Automata on infinite objects. In Jan van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, pages 133–194. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

R. K. Shyamasundar K. Ueda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Merz, S. (1997). Rules for abstraction. In: Shyamasundar, R.K., Ueda, K. (eds) Advances in Computing Science — ASIAN'97. ASIAN 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1345. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63875-X_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63875-X_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63875-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69658-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics