Skip to main content

Detour behavior in evolving robots: Are internal representations necessary?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1468))

Abstract

Internal representations of the environment are often invoked to explain performance in tasks in which an organism must make a detour around an obstacle to reach a target and the organism can lose sight of the target along the path to the target. By simulating a detour task in evolving populations of robots (Khepera) we show that neural networks with memory units perform better than networks without memory units in this task. However, the content of the memory units need not be interpreted as an internal representation of the position of target. The memory units send a time-varying internally generated input to the network's hidden units that allows the network to generate the appropriate behavior even when there is no external input. Networks without memory units do not have this internal input and this explains their inferior performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Donnart, J. Y., Meyer, J. A. Learning reactive and planning rules in a motivationally autonomous animat. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B 26(3) (1996) 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorigo, M., Colombetti, M. Robot shaping: Developing autonomous agents through learning. Artificial Intelligence 71(2) (1994) 321–370

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellen, P., Thinus-Blanc, C. (eds.): Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijkoff (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elman, I.L.: Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  5. Floreano, D., Mondada, F.: Evolution of homing navigation in a real mobile robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B 26(3) (1996) 396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallistel, C. R.: The Organization of Learning. Mit Ness, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nolfi, S., Floreano, D., Miglino, O., Mondada, F.: How to evolve autonomuos robots: Different approaches in evolutionary robotics. In Brooks R. A., Maes P. (eds.): Artificial Life IV. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on The Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. MIT press, Cambridge (1994) 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  8. Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., Zanforlin M.: Object and Spatial representations in detour problems by chicks. Animal Behavior 48 (1994) 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thinus-Blanc, C.: Animal Spatial Cognition. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tolman, E. C.: Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 36 (1948) 13–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Philip Husbands Jean-Arcady Meyer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miglino, O., Denaro, D., Tascini, G., Parisi, D. (1998). Detour behavior in evolving robots: Are internal representations necessary?. In: Husbands, P., Meyer, JA. (eds) Evolutionary Robotics. EvoRobots 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1468. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64957-3_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64957-3_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64957-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49902-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics