Skip to main content

Effect of Stereoscopic Viewing on Human Tracking Performance in Dynamic Virtual Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Virtual Worlds (VW 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1434))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a human factor study aimed at comparing the effect of stereoscopic versus monoscopic viewing on human tracking performance. The experimental paradigm involved tracking and grasping gestures toward a 3D moving object. This experiment was performed using different frame rates (from 28 frames per second (fps) down to 1 fps). Results show that monoscopic viewing allowed stable performance (grasping completion time) down to 14 fps. Stereoscopic viewing extended this stabilty to 9 fps, and decrease task completion time by 50 % for frame rate under 7 fps. We observed that stereoscopic viewing did not much increase performance for high frame rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.P. Georgopoulos, J. Kalaska, and J. Massey, “Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movement: effects of practise, uncertainty, and change in target location”, Journal of Neurophysiol., 46:725–743, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.G. Atkeson and J. Hollenback, “Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movement”, Journal of Neuroscience, 5:2318–2230, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A Thomson, ‘How do we use visual information to control locomotion ?” Trends in Neuroscienc es 3, 247–250, 1980

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J.A Thomson, “Is continual visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion ?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance9, 427–443, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Ranadive, “Video Resolution, Frame-rate, and Grayscale Tradeoffs under Limited Banwidth for Undersea Teleoperation”, SM Thesis, M.I.T, September 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Massinimo and T. Sheridan, “Variable force and visual feedback effects on teleoperator man/machine performance” Proceedings of NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, Pasadena, CA. Vo.1, pp:89–98, January 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y.-Y. Yeh and L.D. Silberstein, “Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays.” Human Factors, 34(5), 583–600, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Regan, K.I. Beverley, “Some dynamic features of depth perception”, Vision Research, Vol:13, 2369–2379, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W.N. Kama and R. DuMars, “Remote Viewing: A Comparison of Direct Viewing, 2-D and 3-D Television, AMRL-TDR-64-15, Wright-Patterson Air-Force Base, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Rupert and D. Wurzburg “Illumination and Television Considerations in Teleoperator Systems”. Heer, E. (Ed.), Remotely Manned Systems, California: California Institute of Technology, pp. 219–228, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.A. Freedman, W. Crooks and P. Coan, “TV Requirements for Manipulation in Space”. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 12,5, 425–438, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.L Pepper, D. Smith and R. Cole, “Stereo TV Improves Operator Performance under Degraded Visibility Condition” Optics and Engineering 20,4, 579–585, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.L. Pepper, R. Cole, E. Spain and J. Sigudson, “Reseach Issues Involved in Applying Stereoscopic Television to Remotelly Operated Vehicles” Proceedings of SPIE, 402-Three-Dimensional Imaging, 170–173, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.R. Ellis, W. Kim, M. Tyler, M. McGreevy and L. Stark, “Visual Enhancement for Telerobotics: Perspective Parameter”. IEEE 1985 Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, pp. 815–818, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.S. Kim, S. Ellis, B. Hannaford, M. Tyler and L. Stark, “A Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Display in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks” IEEE Transportation Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-17,1, pp. 16–72, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. VPL Research Inc., “DataGlove model 2 Operating manual”, Redwood City, CA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Polhemus Navigation Science Division, Space Isotrack User’s Manual, Colchester, VT. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hewlett-Packard, “Starbase Display List Programmers Manual”, 1st Edition, January, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richard, P., Hareux, P., Coiffet, P., Burdea, G. (1998). Effect of Stereoscopic Viewing on Human Tracking Performance in Dynamic Virtual Environments. In: Heudin, JC. (eds) Virtual Worlds. VW 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1434. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68686-X_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68686-X_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64780-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68686-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics