Abstract
An approach to student modelling is presented where learners build their own student models. A more accurate model may thereby be obtained, and learners may reflect on their beliefs while constructing their model. The diyM system is illustrated in four environments: two collaborative student modelling systems, and two learner modelling systems with peer interaction as their focus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck J, Stern M & Woolf BP (1997). Cooperative Student Models, B du Boulay & R Mizoguchi (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 127–134.
Bull S (1997a). See Yourself Write: A Simple Student Model to Make Students Think, A Jameson, C Paris & C Tasso (eds) User Modeling Proceedings of Sixth International Conference, Springer Wien New York, 315–326.
Bull S (1997b). A Multiple Student and User Modelling System for Peer Interaction, R Schäfer & M Bauer (eds) ABIS-97 Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen, Universität des Saarlandes, 61–71.
Bull S & Brna P (1997). What does Susan know that Paul doesn’t? (and vice versa): Contributing to Each Other’s Student Model, B du Boulay & R Mizoguchi (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 568–570.
Bull S & Pain H (1995). ‘Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?’: Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model, Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Washington DC, 501–508.
Cohen AD (1987). Student Processing of Feedback on their Compositions, A Wenden & J Rubin (eds) Learner Strategies in Language Learning, Prentice-Hall, London, 57–69.
Cohen A & Cavalcanti M (1990). Feedback on Compositions teacher & student verbal reports, B. Kroll (ed) Second Language Writing, Cambridge University Press, 155–177.
Crawford K & Kay J (1991). Metacognitive Processes and Learning with Intelligent Educational Systems, Report 91/3/3.1, Systems Group, University of Sydney.
Klenowski V (1995). Student Self-Evaluation Processes in Student-Centred Teaching and Learning Contexts of Australia and England, Assessment in Education 2(2), 145–163.
Morales R, Ramscar M & Pain H (1998). Modelling the Learner’s Awareness and Reflection in a Collaborative Learner Modelling Setting, presented at Workshop on Current Trends and Applications of AI in Education, Mexico City.
Mowl G & Pain R (1995). Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Essay Writing, Innovations in Education and Training International 32(4), 324–335.
Paiva A, Self J & Hartley R (1995). Externalising Learner Models, Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Washington DC, 509–516.
Specht M, Weber G & Schöch V (1997). ADI ein adaptiver Informations-und Lehragent im WWW, R Schäfer & M Bauer (eds) ABIS-97 Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen, Universität des Saarlandes, 53–60.
Self JA (1988). Bypassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling, ITS-88, 18–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bull, S. (1998). ‘Do It Yourself’ Student Models for Collaborative Student Modelling and Peer Interaction. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64770-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68716-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive