Skip to main content

Two-Phase Updating of Student Models Based on Dynamic Belief Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1452))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When a belief network is used to represent a student model, we must have a theoretically-sound way to update this model. In ordinary belief networks, it is assumed that the properties of the external world, modelled by the network, do not change as we go about gathering evidence related to those properties. I present a general approach as to how student model updates should be made, based on the concept of a dynamic belief network, and then show this work relates to previous research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Villano, M. (1992) Probabilistic student models: Bayesian belief networks and knowledge space theory. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, C. and McCalla, G.I. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Proceeding of the Second International Conference, ITS’92, Montreal, Canada), 491–498. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reye, J. (1996) A belief net backbone for student modelling. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, C. and Lesgold, A. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Proceeding of the Third International Conference, ITS’96, Montreal, Canada), 596–604. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dean, T., and Kanazawa, K. (1989) A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence 5, 142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, A., and Anderson, J. (1992) Student modeling and mastery learning in a computer-based programming tutor. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, C. and McCalla, G.I. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Proceeding of the Second International Conference, ITS’92, Montreal, Canada), 413–420. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shute, V. (1995) SMART evaluation: cognitive diagnosis, mastery learning & remediation. In Greer, J. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1995, 123–130. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reye, J. (1998). Two-Phase Updating of Student Models Based on Dynamic Belief Networks. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64770-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68716-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics