Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Spatial Cognition pp 107–127Cite as

Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1404))

Abstract

We propose that mental representations of extrapersonal space are largely determined by the information that is required for actions within that space. Three different aspects of mental representations of space are briefly discussed. First, the physical size of a space restricts the set of behaviors that can be performed within the space. Mental representations of space therefore should differ in important respects depending on the perceived physical size of the referent space. Second, different reference systems can be used to code spatial information. Third, the demands on accuracy of representing spatial information differ between tasks. We posit that specialized mental representations are best suited to accomodate the different demands posed by actions within a given space. The benefit of different formats of mental representations, especially of analog representation, is addressed from a theoretical perspective. We argue that although different representational systems can be constructed that possess similar behavioral characteristics, analog representations in some cases lend themselves to more directly testable predicitions than other representations.

We wish to thank Jörn Diedrichsen, Gerhard Strube and Nicole Wellman for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. We also thank Jörn Diedrichsen, Jörg Gehrke, Friederike Lux, Meret Neumann and Stefanie Wolf for their help in conducting the studies reported herein. This work was funded by a grant by the German Research Foundation (We 1973/3-1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aglioti, S., Goodale, M.A., & DeSouza, J.F.X. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biology, 5, 679–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz, A. (1991). Reference frames for the perception and control of movement. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and Space (pp. 81–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, L.C. (1991). Mental rotation in perspective problems. Acta Psychologica, 76, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1981). Imagery. Cambridge: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D.J. & Tversky, B. (1992). Assessing spatial frameworks with object and direction probes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus, B., Eyferth, K., Gips, C., Hörnig, R., Schmid, U., Wiebrock, S., & Wysotzki, F. (this volume). Reference frames for spatial inference in text understanding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, R.D. & Sholl, M.J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39 A, 541–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N. & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funt. B.V. (1980). Problem-solving with diagrammatic representations. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardin, F. & Meltzer, B. (1989). Analogical representation of naive physics. Artificial Intelligence, 38, 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A.P. & Pellizzer, G. (1995). The mental and the neural: Psychological and neural studies of mental rotation and memory scanning. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1531–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A.P., Lurito, J.T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A.B., & Massey, J.T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1988). Woher kommen Theorien über kognitive Prozesse? Psychologische Rundschau, 39, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, J. & Papadias, D. (1992). Computational imagery. Cognitive Science, 16, 355–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M.A., Milner, A.D., Jakobson, L.S., & Carey, D.P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M.S.A. & Gross, C.G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactive neurons. In M.S. Gazzaniga, (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1021–1034). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüsser, O.-J. (1983). Multimodal structure of the extrapersonal space. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (pp. 327–352). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D.L., O’Dell, C.S., & Arndt, D.R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle, S.C. & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L.V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. & Pomerantz, J.R. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge. MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg-Brückner, G., Röfer, T., Carmesin, H.-O., & Müller, R. (this volume). A taxonomy of spatial knowledge for navigation and its application to the Bremen autonomous wheelchair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. (1982). The “map in the head” metaphor. Environment and Behavior, 14, 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S.S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüer, G., Werner, S. & Lass, U. (1995). Repräsentation analogen Wissens im Gedächtnis. In E. van der Meer and D. Dörner (Hrsg.), Das Gedächtnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, T.P. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1993). Psychological perspectives on spatial cognition. In T. Gärling & R.G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T.P., Hardy, J.K., & Hirtle, S.C. (1989). Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A.D. & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D.R. (1993). Scale and multipe psychologies of space. In A.U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312–321). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J.K. (1992). Solving the real mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S.E. (1978). Fundamental Aspects of cognitive representation. E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259–303). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poucet, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review, 100, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson, C.C. & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presson, C.C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1979). Validating computational models: A critique of Anderson’s indeterminacy of representation claim. Psychological Review, 86, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J.J., Ashmead, D.H., Talor, C.R., & Youngquist, G.A. (1990). Visual pereption and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadalla, E.K., Burroughs, W.J., & Staplin, L.J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 516–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schölkopf, B. & Mallot, H.A. (1995). View-based cognitive mapping and path planning. Adaptive Behavior, 3, 311–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. & Cooper, L.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M.J. & Nolin, T.L. (in press). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M.J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M.J. (1995). The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical Systems, 2, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, A.W. & White, S.H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of largescale environments. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, A.W. (1981). The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In L.S. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial representations and behavior across the life span: Theory and application (pp. 167–194). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1985). Why we need many knowledge representation formalisms. In M. Bramer (Ed.), Research and development in expert systems (pp. 163–183). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1995). Musings on the roles of logical and nonlogical representations in intelligence. In J. Glasgow, N.H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 7–32). Cambridge: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427–443.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • v. Wolff, A. (1997). Der Einfluß von Raumachsen auf das egozentrische Umraummodell. In W. Krause, U. Kotkamp, & R. Goertz (Eds.), KogWis97: Proceedings der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft (241–243). Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mallot, H.A., Schweizer, K. & Freksa, C. (1997). Spatial cognition: The role of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in human and robot navigation. In M. Jarke, K. Pasedach, & K. Pohl (Eds.), Informatik’ 97 (41–50). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S. & Wolf, S. (in preparation). The effects of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference on the mental representation of extrapersonal space.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georg-Elias-Müller Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Gosslerstr. 14, D-37073, Göttingen

    Steffen Werner, Christina Saade & Gerd Lüer

Authors
  1. Steffen Werner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Saade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gerd Lüer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg, Vogt-Kölln-Straße 30, D-22527, Hamburg, Germany

    Christian Freksa  & Christopher Habel  & 

  2. Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Trier, D-54286, Trier, Germany

    Karl F. Wender

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Werner, S., Saade, C., Lüer, G. (1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64603-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69342-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation