Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On reasoning about other agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Agents II Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1037))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Drawing on on our work in the area of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, we propose the rudiments of an approach to reasoning about other agents. We attempt to relate current philosophical intuitions to theoretical foundations, and concentrate on the issue of modeling. The philosophical position we have put forth is a combination of Daniel Dennett's philosophy of the ladder of agenthood (consisting of rationality, intentionality, stance, reciprocity, communication, and consciousness) on one hand, and the utilitarian philosophy of selfish utility maximization on the other hand. Dennett's notion of a stance is fundamental to the issue of modeling other agents, and in interesting special cases ti leads to nesting of models. Our own framework, the Recursive Modeling Method (RMM), represents this nesting and lets an agent coordinate its actions with the actions of other agents, cooperate with them when appropriate, and rationally choose an optimal form of communication with them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robert J. Aumann and Adam Brandenburger. Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harverd, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert J. Aumann and Adam Brandenburger. Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium. Accepted for Publication in Econometrica, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Afzal Ballim and Yoric Wilks. Artificial Believers. Earlbaum Associates, Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. C. Bertrand. Pleasure and Desire: The Case for Hedonism Reviewed. Clarendon Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cristina Bicchieri, Eithan Ephrati, and Aldo Antonelli. Games servers play: A procedural approach. In this Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ken Binmore. Essays on Foundations of Game Theory. Pitman, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peter Cheeseman. In defense of probability. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1002–1009, Los Angeles, California, August 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown & Co., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jon Doyle. Rationality and its role in reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 8:376–409, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edmund H. Durfee, Jaeho Lee, and Piotr Gmytrasiewicz. Overeager rationality and mixed strategy equilibria. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ronald R. Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern, and Moshe Y. Vardi. A model-theoretic analysis of knowledge. Journal of the ACM, (2):382–428, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz and Edmund H. Durfee. Logic of knowledge and belief for recursive modeling: Preliminary report. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 628–634, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz and Edmund H. Durfee. Toward a theory of honesty and trust among communicating autonomous agents. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2:237–258, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz and Edmund H. Durfee. Formalization of recursive modeling. In In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, ICMAS'95, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz and Edmund H. Durfee. Rational interaction in multiagent environments. Submitted for publication, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz, Edmund H. Durfee, and David K. Wehe. A decisiontheoretic approach to coordinating multiagent interactions. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 62–68, August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz, Edmund H. Durfee, and David K. Wehe. The utility of communication in coordinating intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 166–172, July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joseph Y. Halpern. Reasoning about only knowing with many agents. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 655–661, July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph Y. Halpern and Yoram Moses. Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. In Third ACM Conference on Principles of Distributed Computing, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joseph Y. Halpern and Yoram Moses. A guide to the modal logics of knowledge and belief. Technical Report 74007, IBM Corporation, Almaden Research Center, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph Y. Halpern and Yoram Moses. Reasoning about knowledge: a survey circa 1991. Technical Report 50521, IBM Corporation, Almaden Research Center, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Harsanyi. Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. American Economic Review, (68):223–228, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph B. Kadane and Patrick D. Larkey. Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Science, 28(2):113–120, February 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roger B. Myerson. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ajit Narayanan. On Being a Machine. Ellis Horwood, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richard E. Neapolitan. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. John Wiley and Sons, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Judea Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufman, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. L. Pollock. How to Build a Person: A Prolegomenon. MIT Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ayn Rand. On the Virtue of Selfishness, a new Concept of Egoism. New American Library, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gilag Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yoav Shoham. Agent-oriented programming. Technical Report STAN-CS-90-1335, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yoav Shoham and Moshe Tennenholtz. On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agents societies (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eric Werner. Toward a theory of communication and cooperation for multiagent planning. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowladge, pages 129–142. Morgan Kaufman, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 76019, Arlington, TX

    Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz

Authors
  1. Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Michael Wooldridge Jörg P. Müller Milind Tambe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gmytrasiewicz, P.J. (1996). On reasoning about other agents. In: Wooldridge, M., Müller, J.P., Tambe, M. (eds) Intelligent Agents II Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. ATAL 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1037. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3540608052_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3540608052_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60805-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49594-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation