Skip to main content

The Road Toward Ontologies

  • Chapter
Book cover Ontologies

Abstract

One of the most important characteristics of today’s society is that a huge amount of information is shared by many participants (people, applications). This information must be characterized by a uniformity of terms. This means that, in similar contexts, everyone should understand the same meaning when reading or hearing the same word and everyone should use the same word to refer to the same concept. In different Computer Science disciplines one of the methods that satisfies this need for “common understanding” of concepts is the creation of ontologies. Curiously, there are different interpretations of what ontology is. In this chapter, we show the way that the concept of ontology has expanded from Philosophy into Computer Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AAT, 2005, Art & Architecture Thesaurus Online; (March 7, 2005) http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/aat/.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACM, 1998, The ACM Computing Classification System, 1998 Version. http://www.acm.org/class.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, A.P., de Santos D.C., de Lucena F.N., da Silva J.C., 2004, Software engineering documentation: an ontology-based approach, WebMedia and LA-Web, 2004. Proceedings. pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, 1994, Metaphysics. Chapters I and V. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., 2004, Description Logics. In: Staab S and Studer R, ed. Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 03–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., 1993. Object-oriented Analysis and Design with Applications (2nd edition). Canada: Addison-Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L., Hall, W., Bechofer, S., Goble, C., 2001, Conceptual Linking: Ontology-Based Open Hypermedia. International World Wide Web Conference 2004, pp. 334–342. New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.R., 2003, What are ontologies, and why do we need them? Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE. IEEE Intelligent Systems Volume 14, Issue 1. pp. 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.B., 1991, Formal Ontology. In: Burkhard, H. and Smith, B. (eds), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conesa, J., Palol, X. de, Olivé, A., 2003, Building Conceptual Schemas by Refining General Ontologies. In Marik, V, et al (ed). DEXA 2003. pp: 693–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A., Leger, A., Rey, C., Toumani, F., 2003, An Ontology-based Mediation Architecture for E-commerce Applications. IIS 2003; pp. 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranefield, S., Purvis, M., 1999, UML as an Ontology Modelling Language. In: Fensel D, Knoblock C, Kushmeric N and Rousset MC, ed. IJCAI’99 Workshop on Intelligent information integration. Stockholm, Sweden. Amsterdam, 5.1–5.8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., Duke, A., Sure, Y., 2003, OntoShare-A Knowledge Management Environmental for Virtual Communities of Practice. International Conference On Knowledge Capture Sanibel Island 2003. New York. ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehoney, D., Harte, R., Lu, Y., Chin, D., 2003, Using natural language processing and the gene ontology to populate a structured pathway database. Bioinformatics Conference, 2003. CSB 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE. pp. 646–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensel, D., 2004, Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • García Sierra, P., 1999, Diccionario filosófico. Manual de materialismo filosófico. Una introducción analítica. Oviedo: Biblioteca Filosofía en español.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, Y., Yu, Y., Zhu, X., Huang, S., Xu, M., 2003, Onto Vote: A Scalable Distributed Vote-Collecting Mechanism For Ontology Drift On A P2P Platform, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(30): 257–263. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golebiowska, J., Dieng-Kuntz, R., Corby, O., Mousseau, D., 2001, Building And Exploiting Ontologies For An Automobile Project Memory, International Conference On Knowledge Capture, pp. 52–59. New York: ACM Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O., 2003, Ontological Enginering. London, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosof, B., Poon, T., 2003, Sweetdeal: Representing Agent Contracts With Exceptions Using XML Rules, Ontologies And Process Descriptions, International World Wide Web Conference. pp: 340–349. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T.R., 1993, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2): 199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüninger, M., Fox, M.S., 1995, Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies, In: Skuce, D., ed. IJCAI 95 Workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing., 6.1–6.10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., Giaretta, P., 1995, Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification. In: NJI Mars, ed. Towards very large knowledge bases. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., 1998, Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: FOIS’98, Trento, Italy. Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • KACTUS, 1996, The KACTUS Booklet version 1.0 Esprit Project 8145 KACTUS, (April 5, 2005); http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/projects/NewKACTUS/Reports.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, P., Cranefield, S., Hart, L., Dutra, M., Baclawski, K., Kokar, M., Smith, J., 2002, UML for Ontology Development. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(1); 61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, J., Lange, M., Hofestadt, R., Schulze-Kremer, S. Logical and semantic database integration, 2000, Bio-Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2000. Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V., 1990, Building large knowledge-based systems: Representations and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley, Boston Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., 1980, Circumscription — A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13; 27–39

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mosterín, J., 2000 Conceptos y teorías en la ciencia. Editorial Alianza. Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Staab, S., Tane, J., 2001, EDUTELLA: Searching and Annotating Resources within an RDF-based P2P Network. (April 27, 2005); http://edutella.jxta.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter, J.T., 1997, Epistemology. In: S. Shapiro, ed. Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence. Wyley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberle, D., Spyns, P., 2004, The Knowledge Portal “OntoWeb”, In: Staab, S. and Studer, R., ed. Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp: 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, 1993, Compact Oxford Dictionary. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R., 2004, Descriptive, Formal and Formalized Ontologies. University of Trento. Mitteleuropa Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S.H., 2003, On the fusion and transference of knowledge. II. Information Reuse and Integration, 2003. IRI 2003. IEEE International Conference on. pp. 150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallantin, J., Divol, J., Duroux, P., 2003, Conceptual framework for interactive ontology building, Cognitive Informatics, 2003. Proceedings. The Second IEEE International Conference on. pp. 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R. de, Shadbolt, N., Velde, W. van de, Wielinga, B., 1999, Knowledge Engineering And Management — The CommonKDAS Methodology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., Welty, C., 2002, Ontology: Towards a New Synthesis. FOIS Introducction 2002. Amsterdam: IOS Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., 1998, The Basic Tools of Formal Ontology, In: Nicola Guarino (ed.). Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications), pp. 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., Wroe, C., Lord, P., Goble, C., 2004, Ontologies In Bioinformatics. In: Staab, S. and Studer, R., ed. Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 635–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanovic, N., Gonzalez, J., Stojanovic, L., 2003, ONTOLONGER — A System For Usage-Driven Management Of Ontology-Based Information Portals, International Conference On Knowledge Capture Sanibel Island, New York: ACM Press, pp. 172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tane, J., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G., 2004, Semantic Resources Management for the Web: An E-Learning Application, International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 01–10. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosic, P. T., Agha, G. A., 2004, Towards a hierarchical taxonomy of autonomous agents. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on. 4:3421–3426

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschold, M., King, M., 1995, Towards a Methodology for building ontologies. In: Skuce D, ed. IJCAI’95m Workshop on Basic Ontological Issue in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal, 6.1–6.10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heijst, G., Schereiber, A. T., Wielinga, B. J., 1996, Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G., Taveter, K., 2004, Towards radical agent-oriented software engineering processes based on AOR modeling. Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004). Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on. pp. 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weißenberg, N., Voisard, A., Gartmann, R., 2004, Using Ontologies In Personalized Mobile Applications. The 12 th Annual ACM International Workshop on Geographic Information Systems. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WordNet, 2005, WordNet A lexical database for the English language. 2005, (February 3, 2005); http://wordnet.princeton.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhibin, L., Xiaoyong, D., Ishii, N., 1998, Integrating databases in Internet. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Proceedings KES’ 98. 1998 Second International Conference on. 3: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sánchez, D.M., Cavero, J.M., Martínez, E.M. (2007). The Road Toward Ontologies. In: Sharman, R., Kishore, R., Ramesh, R. (eds) Ontologies. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37022-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37022-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-37019-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-37022-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics