Skip to main content

Image Metadata

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Database Systems
  • 161 Accesses

Synonyms

Pictorial metadata; Picture metadata; Image representation

Definition

A digital image is a representation of a two- or three-dimensional image, where the representation can be of vector or raster type.

Metadata is data about data of any sort in any media, describing an individual datum, content item, or a collection of data including multiple content items. In that way, metadata facilitates the understanding, characteristics, use and management of data.

Image metadata is structured, encoded data that describes content and representation characteristics of information-baring image entities to facilitate the automatic or semiautomatic identification, discovery, assessment, and management of the described entities, as well as their generation, manipulation, and distribution.

Historical Background

Many of the techniques of digital image processing were developed in the 1960s at, among others, the MIT, Bell Labs, and the University of Maryland. These works tried to automatically...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Ahern S., Davis M., Eckles D., King S., Naaman M., Nair R., Spasojevic M., and Hui-I Yang J. ZoneTag: designing context-aware mobile media capture to increase participation. In Proc. Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing: New Social Practices and Implications for Technology Workshop, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. (ed.) Blasser Database Techniques for Pictorial Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 81. Springer, London, UK, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhardt H. and Siggelkow S. Invariant features for discriminating between equivalence classes. Nonlinear Model-Based Image Video Processing and Analysis. Wiley, NY, 2001, pp. 269–307.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox I.J., Miller M.L., Minka T.P., and Papathomas T.V. The Bayesian image retrieval system, picHunter: theory, implementation, and pychophysical experiments. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9(1):20–37, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis M. 2003, Active capture: integrating human-computer interaction and computer vision/audition to automate media capture. Vol. 2. pp. 185–188.In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo,

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorai C. and Venkatesh S. Bridging the semantic gap in content management systems – computational media aesthetics. In Media Computing Computational Media Aesthetics, C. Dorai, S. Venkatesh (eds.). Kluwer, Boston, MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eco U. Articulations of the cinematic code. In Movies and Methods, B. Nichols (ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley, 1976, pp. 590–607.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frederix G., Caenen G., and Pauwels E.J. PARISS: Panoramic, Adaptive and Reconfigurable Interface for Similarity Search. In Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, 2000 vol. 3, pp. 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hardman L., Obrenovic Z., Nack F., Kerherve B., and Piersol K. Canonical processes of semantically annotated media production. Multimedia Systems, 14(6):327–340, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hollink L. Semantic Annotation for Retrieval of Visual Resaources. Ph.D thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin H.C., Wang L.L., and Yang S.N. Color image retrieval based on hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 6(2):332–339, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nack F., Windhouwer M., Hardman L., Pauwels E., and Huijberts M. The role of highlevel and lowlevel features in style-based retrieval and generation of multimedia presentations. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 7(1):7–37, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smeulders A.W.M., Worring M., Santini S., Gupta A., and Jain R. Content-based image retrieval: the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22(12):1349–1380, December 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith S.M. and Brady J.M. SUSANÐA new approach to low level image processing. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 23(1):45–78, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swain M.J. Searching for multimedia on the World Wide Web, icms. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, 1999, pp. 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swain M.J. and Ballard B.H. Color indexing. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 7(1):11–32, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Dublin core metadata initiative. Available at: http://www.dublincore.org/. Access date: October 12th 2008.

  18. Weber M., Welling M., and Perona P. Towards automatic discovery of object categories. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000, pp. 2101–2108.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W3C multimedia incubator group. Available at: http//www.w3.org/2005/incubator/mmsem/. Access date: October 12th 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nack, F. (2009). Image Metadata. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1521

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics