Skip to main content

Multiple Representation Modeling

  • Reference work entry

Synonyms

Multi-scale; Multi-resolution; Multi-granularity modeling

Definition

Geodata management systems (i.e., GIS and DBMS) are said to support multiple representationsif they have the capability to record and manage multiple representations of the same real-world phenomena. For example, the same building may have two representations, one with administrative data (e.g., owner and address) and a geometry of type point, and the other one with technical information (e.g., material and height) and a geometry of type surface. Multirepresentation is essential to make a data repository suitable for use by various applications that focus on the same real world of interest, while each application has a specific perception matching its goals. Different perceptions translate into different requirements determining what information is kept and how it is structured, characterized, and valued. A typically used case is map agencies that edit a series of national maps at various scales and on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Badard T. and Lemarié C. Propagating updates between geographic databases with different scales, chapter 10. In Innovations in GIS 7: GIS and GeoComputation, P. Atkinson, D. Martin (eds.). Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 2000, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bédard Y. and Bernier E. Supporting multiple representations with spatial view management and the concept of VUEL. In Proc. Joint Workshop on Multi-Scale Representations of Spatial Data, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borges K., Davis C.A., and Laender A. OMT-G: an object-oriented data model for geographic applications. GeoInformatica, 5(3):221–260, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Devogele T., Parent C., and Spaccapietra S. On spatial database integration. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 12(4):335–352, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friis-Christensen A., Jensen C.S., Nytun J.P., and Skogan D. A conceptual schema language for the management of multiple representations of geographic entities. Trans. GIS, 9(3):345–380, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kilpelaïnen T. Maintenance of topographic data by multiple representations. In Proc. Annual Conference and Exposition of GIS/LIS, 1998, pp. 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mustière S. and Van Smaalen J. Database requirements for generalisation and multiple representations. In Generalisation of Geographical Information: Cartographic Modelling and Applications, W.A. Mackaness, A. Ruas, T. Sarjakoski (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parent C., Spaccapietra S., and Zimányi E. Conceptual Modeling for Traditional and Spatio-temporal Applications. The MADS Approach. Springer, Berlin, 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarjakoski L.T. Conceptual models of generalisation and multiple representation. In Generalisation of Geographical Information: Cartographic Modelling and Applications, W.A. Mackaness, A. Ruas, T. Sarjakoski (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheeren D., Mustière S., and Zucker J.D. How to integrate heterogeneous spatial databases in a consistent way? In Proc. 8th East-European Conf. Advances in Databases and Information Systems, 2004, pp. 364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sotnykova A., Vangenot C., Cullot N., Bennacer N., and Aufaure M.-A. Semantic mappings in description logics for spatio-temporal database schema integration. Journal on Data Semantics III:143–167, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stell J.G. and Worboys M.F. Stratified map spaces: a formal basis for multi-resolution spatial databases. In Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling, 1998, pp. 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stuckenschmidt H., Parent C., and Spaccapietra S. (Eds.). Modular Ontologies. Springer LNCS, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Timpf S. Map cube model: a model for multi-scale data. In Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling, 1998, pp. 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weibel R. and Dutton G. Generalizing spatial data and dealing with multiple representations. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, vol. 1, 2nd edn., P. Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, D.W. Rhind (eds.). Wiley, 1999, pp. 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S., Vangenot, C., Zimányi, E. (2009). Multiple Representation Modeling. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_237

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics