Skip to main content

Quality and Trust of Information Content and Credentialing

  • Reference work entry
  • 50 Accesses

Definition

The quality and reliability of biomedical information is critical for practitioners (clinicians and biomedical scientists) to make important decisions about patient conditions and to draw key scientific conclusions towards developing new drugs, therapies and procedures. Evaluating the quality and trustworthiness of biomedical information [1] requires answering questions such as, where did the data come from, under what conditions was the data generated, how accurate and complete is the data, and so on.

Key Points

The quality and reliability of biomedical information is dependent on the task or the context of the application. There is a basic set of domain-independent features that can be used to characterize the quality and trustworthiness of the information:

Accuracy: The correctness of the information. Inherent noisiness in the underlying data generating clinical processes or biological experiments often leads to various errors in the resulting data. It is critical to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Black N. High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers. Lancet, 353(9160):1205–1211, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buza T.J., McCarthy F.M., Wang N., Bridges S.M., and Burgess S.C. 2008.Gene Ontology annotation quality analysis in model eukaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res., 36(2):e12,

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Ascenzo M.D., Collmer A., and Martin G.B. PeerGAD: a peer-review-based and community-centric web application for viewing and annotating prokaryotic genome sequences. Nucl. Acids Res., 32(10):3124–3159, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thiru K., Hassey A., and Sullivan F. 2003.Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ, 26(7398):1070,

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Patel, C., Weng, C. (2009). Quality and Trust of Information Content and Credentialing. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_288

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics