Skip to main content

Cardinal Direction Relationships

  • Reference work entry
Book cover Encyclopedia of Database Systems
  • 131 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Cicerone S. and Di Felice P. Cardinal directions between spatial objects: the pairwise-consistency problem. Inf. Sci., 164(1–4):165–188, 2004.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Clementini E. and Billen R. Modeling and computing ternary projective relations between regions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 18(6):799–814, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freksa C. Using orientation information for qualitative spatial reasoning. In Proceedings of COSIT’92, LNCS, vol. 639, 1992, pp. 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goyal R. Similarity Assessment for Cardinal Directions Between Extended Spatial Objects. PhD Thesis, Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering, University of Maine, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hernández D. Qualitative Representation of Spatial Knowledge, LNCS, vol. 804. Springer, Berlin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ligozat G. Reasoning about cardinal directions. J. Visual Lang. Comput., 9:23–44, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mukerjee A. and Joe G. A qualitative model for space. In Proc. 7th National Conf. on AI, 1990, pp. 721–727.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Navarrete I., Morales A., and Sciavicco G. Consistency checking of basic cardinal constraints over connected regions. In Proc. 20th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, 2007, pp. 495–500.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papadias D. Relation-based representation of spatial knowledge. PhD Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peuquet D.J. and Ci-Xiang Z. An algorithm to determine the directional relationship between arbitrarily-shaped polygons in the plane. Pattern Recognit, 20(1):65–74, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Skiadopoulos S. and Koubarakis M. Composing cardinal direction relations. Artif. Intell., 152(2):143–171, 2004.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Skiadopoulos S. and Koubarakis M. On the consistency of cardinal directions constraints. Artif. Intell., 163(1):91–135, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Skiadopoulos S., Giannoukos C., Sarkas N., Vassiliadis P., Sellis T., and Koubarakis M. Computing and managing cardinal direction relations. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(12):1610–1623, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Skiadopoulos S., Sarkas N., Sellis T., and Koubarakis M. A family of directional relation models for extended objects. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19(8):1116–1130, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Skiadopoulos, S. (2009). Cardinal Direction Relationships. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics