Skip to main content

Field-Based Information Retrieval Models

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Database Systems
  • 138 Accesses

Definition

A document D consists of a set of n document fields, and it is represented by a set of n vectors, where each vector corresponds to a document field. A field-based Information Retrieval (IR) model assigns a score or Retrieval Status Value (RSV) to a document D and a query Q by distinguishing the occurrences of query terms in the different field vectors, and by weighting the contribution of each field appropriately.

Historical Background

Textual documents, whether they are news wire items, scientific publications, or Web pages, are rich in structure. For example, depending on its length, a text can be organized in chapters, sections, paragraphs, and each of those can have a concise description in the form of a title. Shorter texts, such as emails, also consist of free text and formatted text. In information retrieval (IR), however, documents are usually represented as a single vector, the dimensions of which correspond to terms occurring in the document. Such a representation...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Fagin R., Kumar R., McCurley K.S., Novak J., Sivakumar D., Tomlin J.A., and Williamson D.P. Searching the workplace web. In Proc. 12th Int. World Wide Web Conference. 2003, pp. 366–375.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fox E.A. Extending the Boolean and Vector Space Models of Information Retrieval with P-Norm Queries and Multiple Concept Types. Ph.D dissertation, Cornell University, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox E.A. Coefficients of combining concept classes in a collection. In Proc. 11th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1988, pp. 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hawking D. and Craswell N. The very large collection and Web tracks. In TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval, E. Voorhees, D. Harman (eds.). MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005, pp. 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawking D., Upstill T., and Craswell N. Toward better weighting of anchors. In Proc. 30th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2004, pp. 512–513.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lalmas M. Uniform representation of content and structure for structured document retrieval. Technical report, Queen Mary University of London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald C. and Ounis I. Combining fields in known-item email search. In Proc. 32nd Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2006, pp. 675–676.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Macdonald C., Plachouras V., He B., Lioma C., and Ounis I. University of Glasgow at WebCLEF 2005: experiments in per-field normalisation and language specific stemming. In Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories, Sixth Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, 2005, pp. 898–907.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malik S., Trotman A., Lalmas M., and Fuhr N. Overview of INEX 2006. In Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems. LNCS 4518, Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 1–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Myaeng S.H., Jang D.H., Kim M.S., and Zhoo Z.C. A flexible model for retrieval of SGML documents. In Proc. 21st Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1998, pp. 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ogilvie P. and Callan J. Combining document representations for known-item search. In Proc. 26th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2003, pp. 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plachouras V. and Ounis I. Multinomial randomness models for retrieval with document fields. In Proc. 29th European Conf. on IR Research, 2007, pp. 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson S., Zaragoza H., and Taylor M. Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, 2004, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Switzer P. Vector images in information retrieval. In Proc. Symp. on Statistical Association Methods for Mechanical Documentation, 1965, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor M., Zaragoza H., Craswell N., Robertson S., and Burges C. Optimisation methods for ranking functions with multiple parameters. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, 2006, pp. 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkinson R. Effective retrieval of structured documents. In Proc. 17th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1994, pp. 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zaragoza H., Craswell N., Taylor M., Saria S., and Robertson S. Microsoft Cambridge at TREC-13: Web and HARD tracks. In Proc. 13th Text Retrieval Conf., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Plachouras, V. (2009). Field-Based Information Retrieval Models. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_927

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics