Skip to main content

Towards a Unified Representation Framework for Modelbases and Databases

  • Chapter
  • 788 Accesses

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 2))

Abstract

Modelbases and databases are complementary to each other in Decision Support Systems. Hence, there exists a need for a framework to uniformly represent modelbases and databases in order to facilitate information exchange and integration between them. Because of the advancement in Web technologies and business globalization, such a framework must be Web-based, promote reuse and share modelbase and database information among branch locations, and be able to express user-defined rules, which are culturally diverse. This paper proposes a unified framework for modelbases and databases. It comprises two major components: Ontology and Schema. The former provides the meanings of specific terminology widely agreed upon by concerned communities; the latter, contains purely generic schematic descriptions of specific information. The framework is represented by means of OWL Declarative Description (ODD)—a language with well-defined semantics and expressive means for direct and uniform representation of database and modelbase components, as well as inferences and rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anutariya C., Wuwongse V., Akama K., and Nantajeewarawat E., ‘RDF Declarative Description (RDD): A Language for Metadata”. Journal of Digital Information Vol. 2(2), (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anutariya C., Wuwongse V., Akama K., Wattanapailin V., “Semantic Web modeling and programming with XDD”, Proceedings of 1st Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS’01), CA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bechhofer S., Harmelen F., Hendler J., Horrocks I., McGuinness D., Patel-Schneider P., and Stein L., OWL Web Ontology Language reference, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dolk D., “A Generalized Model Management system for Mathematical Programming”, AMC Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 12(2), (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ezechukwu O. and Maros I., “OOF: Open Optimization Framework”, Departmental Technical Report 2003/7, Imperial College London, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guide to Available Mathematical software (GAMS), NIST, Available online: http://gams.nist.gov

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huh S. and Chung Q., “A model management framework for heterogeneous algebraic models: Object-oriented data base management systems approach”, Omega, International Journal of Management Science Vol.23(3), (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H., “An XML-based modeling language for the open interchange of decision models”, Decision Support Systems Vol.31, (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klyne G. and Carroll J., “Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax”, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon O. and Park S., “RMT: A modeling support system for model reuse”, Decision Support Systems Vol.16, (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liang, T., “Integrating Model Management with Data Management in Decision Support Systems”, Decision Support Systems Vol.1, (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin S., Schuff D., and Louis R., “Subscript-Free Languages: A tool for facilitating the formulation and use of models”, European Journal of Operational Research Vol.123(3), (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Potter W., Byrd T., Miller J., and Kochut K., “Extending Decision Support Systems: The integration of data, knowledge, and model management”, Annals of Operations Research Vol.38, (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Power D. and Kaparthi S., “Building Web-based Decision Support Systems”, Studies in Informatics and Control Vol.11(4), (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith S., and Becker M., “An Ontology for Constructing Scheduling Systems”, Working notes for 1997 AAAI Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford (AAAI Press), CA, March (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Time ontology, SRI International’s Artificial Intelligence Center (AIC), Available online: http://www.ai.sri.com/daml/ontoiogies/time/Time.daml

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uschold M., King M., Moralee S., and Zorgios Y., “The Enterprise Ontology”, The Knowledge Engineering Review (13), Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to Use, (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhrammanee, T., Wuwongse, V. (2007). Towards a Unified Representation Framework for Modelbases and Databases. In: Kulkarni, U., Power, D.J., Sharda, R. (eds) Decision Support for Global Enterprises. Annals of Information Systems, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48137-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48137-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-48136-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48137-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics