Skip to main content

A Longitudinal Study of Information Exchange in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups

  • Chapter
  • 790 Accesses

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 2))

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that groups do not exchange information effectively. This is particularly true of groups using computer-mediated communication systems (CMCS). However, generalizing the findings of these studies to real groups is difficult because they used ad hoc groups and/or the groups did not have experience with the CMCS and were working on novel tasks. In this study face-to-face groups and groups using two types of CMCS completed three information exchange tasks. Information exchange performance and relational links were collected for each task. The results suggest that CMCS groups are not able to exchange information as effectively as face-to-face groups, even as they become familiar with the task and CMCS. In addition, although relational links were slightly related to information exchange performance, they were not as important as communication mode in explaining differences in information exchange performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi, M. and Keen, P.W. “Business Teams in an Information Age,” Information Society, (6:4), 1989, pp. 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, K. and Chidambaram, L. “How Much Bandwidth is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes,” MIS Quarterly (23:4), 1999, pp. 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chidambaram, L. “Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups,” MIS Quarterly (20:2), 1996, pp. 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cramton, C.D. “Information Problems in Dispersed Teams,” Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference, Chicago, 1997, pp. 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R. “Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design,” Management Science (32:5), 1986, pp. 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis, A.R. “Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can’t Make It Think,” MIS Quarterly (20:4), 1996a, pp. 433–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis, A.R. “Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making,” Small Group Research (27:4), 1996b, pp. 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis, A.R., Hilmer, K.M. and Tayior, N.J. “Information Exchange and Use in GSS and Verbal Group Decision Making: Effects of Minority Influence,” Journal of Management Information Systems (14:3), 1998, pp. 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. “A foundation for the study of groups decision support systems,” Management Science, (33:5), 1987, pp. 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gigone, D. and Hastie, R. “The Common Knowledge Effect: Information Sharing and Group Judgement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (65:5), 1993, pp. 959–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hightower, R.T. and Sayeed, L. “The Impact of Computer Mediated Communication Systems On Biased Group Discussion,” Computers in Human Behavior (11:1) 1995, pp. 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hightower, R.T. and Sayeed, L. “Effects of Prediscussion Information Characteristics on Computer Mediated Group Discussion,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, December 1996, pp. 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. and Franz, T. “Diagnosing Groups: Charting the Flow of Information in Medical Decision-Making Teams,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (71:2), 1996, pp. 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McGrath, J.E. “Time, Interaction and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups,” Small Group Research (22:2), 1991, pp. 147–174.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mennecke, B.E. and Valacich, J.S. “Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions,” Journal of Management Information Systems (15:2), 1998, pp. 173–197.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, V.S. and Jarvenpaa, S.L. “Computer Support of Groups: Theory Based Models for GDSS Research,” Management Science (37:10), 1991, pp. 1347–1363.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Seashore, S.E. Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication”, Management Science (32:11), 1986, pp. 1492–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stasser, G. and Titus, W., “Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Group Discussion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (48:6), 1985, pp. 1467–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stasser, G. and Titus, W. “Effects of Information Load and Percentage of Shared Information on the Dissemination of Unshared Information During Group Discussion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (53:1), 1987, pp. 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stasser, G., Taylor, L.A., and Hanna, C. “Information Sampling in Structured and Unstructured Discussions of Three-and Six-Person Groups,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (57:1), 1989, pp. 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stasser, G. and Stewart, D. “Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Groups: Solving a Problem Versus Making a Judgement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (63:3), 1992, pp. 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walther, J.B. and Burgoon, J.K. “Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction,” Human Communication Research (19:1), 1992, pp. 50–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Warkenlin, M.E., Sayeed, L. and Hightower, R.T. “Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System,” Decision Sciences (28:4), 1997, pp. 975–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wittenbaum, G.M and Stasser, G. “Management of Information in Small Groups” in What’s Social About Social Cognition, Judith L. Nye and Aaron M. Brower (eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996, pp. 3–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hightower, R., Sayeed, L., Warkentin, M. (2007). A Longitudinal Study of Information Exchange in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups. In: Kulkarni, U., Power, D.J., Sharda, R. (eds) Decision Support for Global Enterprises. Annals of Information Systems, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48137-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48137-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-48136-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48137-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics